Automated fatty liver disease detection in point-of-care ultrasound B-mode images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PurposeNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an increasing global health concern, with a prevalence of 25% worldwide. The rising incidence of NAFLD, an asymptomatic condition, reinforces the need for systematic screening strategies in primary care. We present the use of non-expert acquired point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) B-mode images for the development of an automated steatosis classification algorithm.ApproachWe obtained a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant dataset consisting of 478 patients [body mass index 23.60 ± 3.55, age 40.97 ± 10.61], imaged with POCUS by non-expert health care personnel. A U-Net deep learning (DL) model was used for liver segmentation in the POCUS B-mode images, followed by 224 × 224 patch extraction of liver parenchyma. Several DL models including VGG-16, ResNet-50, Inception V3, and DenseNet-121 were trained for binary classification of steatosis. All layers of each tested model were unfrozen, and the final layer was replaced with a custom classifier. Majority voting was applied for patient-level results.ResultsOn a hold-out test set of 81 patients, the final DenseNet-121 model yielded an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 90.1%, sensitivity of 95.0%, and specificity of 85.2% for the detection of liver steatosis. Average cross-validation performance in models using patches of liver parenchyma as input outperformed methods using complete B-mode frames.ConclusionsDespite minimal POCUS acquisition training, and low-quality B-mode images, it is possible to detect steatosis using DL algorithms. Implementation of this algorithm in POCUS software may offer an accessible, low-cost steatosis screening technology, for use by non-expert health care personnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".