MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379390202 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.214502

Superconducting properties of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>La</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Cu</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Ni</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>As</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>: A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>SR</mml:mi></mml:math> study

2023· article· lv· W4379390202 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Qiong Wu, K. W. Chen, Zihao Zhu, Cheng Tan, Yanxing Yang, Xin Li, T. Shiroka, Chen Xu, Jiangang Guo, Xiaolong Chen, Lei Shu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2023
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaPaul Scherrer InstitutTRIUMF
KeywordsMuon spin spectroscopySuperconductivityPhysicsCondensed matter physicsLondon penetration depthMuonParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the results of muon spin rotation and relaxation $(\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR})$ measurements on the recently discovered layered Cu-based superconducting material ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{({\mathrm{Cu}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Ni}}_{x})}_{5}{\mathrm{As}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ ($x=0.40$ and 0.45). Transverse-field $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ experiments on both samples show that the temperature dependence of superfluid density is best described by a two-band model. The absolute values of zero-temperature magnetic penetration depth ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{ab}}(0)$ were found to be 427(1.7) and 422(1.5) nm for $x=0.40$ and 0.45, respectively. Both compounds are located between the unconventional and the standard BCS superconductors in the Uemura plot. No evidence of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the superconducting state is suggested by zero-field $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.015
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0110.014
Scholarly communication0.0110.011
Open science0.0180.017
Research integrity0.0140.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9230.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicIron-based superconductors researchFrench-language works237,207