MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379391297 · doi:10.7765/9781526161703.00024

Olive Allen and the graphic nonchalance of the Modern Girl, illustrated

2023· book-chapter· en· W4379391297 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaleen Grove

Bibliographic record

VenueManchester University Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture, Design, and Social History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlIdentity (music)MoresThe artsAutonomyArtVisual artsSociologyAestheticsPsychologyLawPolitical scienceDevelopmental psychologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In contrast to the conventional 'neat history' that emphasizes solo male achievement in a singular mode, Martha Scotford once proposed 'messy history': a non-canonical, non-hierarchical, female-led approach that considers design as an open-ended feedback loop where women creators embrace multiple roles, such as collaborator, educator, consumer, and critic. The life of British illustrator and writer Olive Allen (married name Biller; b. 1879 England, d. 1957 Canada), nicknamed Bad Anna by her family for her 'artistic temperament', provides an opportunity to examine in what 'messy' ways private life and illustration career intermingled; and how practices like hers were devalued in the historical record. This chapter examines how Biller's oeuvre reflects the private school for girls that her family operated, annual family gatherings in Cornwall, and her art school training first as an Arts and Crafts acolyte of Herbert McNair and then as a graduate of the Slade School of Art. A 'messy history' analysis allows us to see the community behind Allen's illustrating 'for schoolgirls and other people' (as she put it). Allen's genteel rebelliousness ensured acceptability and mild progress for the girls she knew. It afforded 'Bad Anna' herself an identity, a market, and autonomy, while helping young readers mediate between Victorian mores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManchester University Press eBooksSame topicArchitecture, Design, and Social HistoryFrench-language works237,207