: A Semantics-Guided Safety Enhancement Framework for AI-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) have been widely adopted in various industry domains to support many important tasks that impact our daily lives, such as automotive vehicles, robotics manufacturing, and energy systems. As Artificial Intelligence (AI) has demonstrated its promising abilities in diverse tasks like decision-making, prediction, and optimization, a growing number of CPSs adopt AI components in the loop to further extend their efficiency and performance. However, these modern AI-enabled CPSs have to tackle pivotal problems that the AI-enabled control systems might need to compensate the balance acrossmultiple operation requirementsand avoid possible defections in advance to safeguard human lives and properties. Modular redundancy and ensemble method are two widely adopted solutions in the traditional CPSs and AI communities to enhance the functionality and flexibility of a system. Nevertheless, there is a lack of deep understanding of the effectiveness of such ensemble design on AI-CPSs across diverse industrial applications. Considering the complexity of AI-CPSs, existing ensemble methods fall short of handling such huge state space and sophisticated system dynamics. Furthermore, an ideal control solution should consider the multiple system specifications in real-time and avoid erroneous behaviors beforehand. Such that, a new specification-oriented ensemble control system is of urgent need for AI-CPSs. In this paper, we propose$\mathtt {SIEGE}$, a semantics-guided ensemble control framework to initiate an early exploratory study of ensemble methods on AI-CPSs and aim to construct an efficient, robust, and reliable control solution for multi-tasks AI-CPSs. We first utilize a semantic-based abstraction to decompose the large state space, capture the ongoing system status and predict future conditions in terms of the satisfaction of specifications. We propose a series of new semantics-aware ensemble strategies and an end-to-end Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) hierarchical ensemble method to improve the flexibility and reliability of the control systems. Our large-scale, comprehensive evaluations over five subject CPSs show that 1) the semantics abstraction can efficiently narrow the large state space and predict the semantics of incoming states, 2) our semantics-guided methods outperform state-of-the-art individual controllers and traditional ensemble methods, and 3) the DRL hierarchical ensemble approach shows promising capabilities to deliver a more robust, efficient, and safety-assured control system. To enable further research along this direction to build better AI-enabled CPS, we made all of the code and experimental results data publicly available athttps://sites.google.com/view/ai-cps-siege/home.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".