MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379416786 · doi:10.1353/thr.2011.a413088

The Grip of It

2011· article· en· W4379416786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William Giraldi

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œHopkins review/Hopkins review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)NothingOrder (exchange)GirlGlobeHistoryArtArt historyLawPsychologyPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Grip of It William Giraldi (bio) Another unholy October heatwave in Boston and I felt compelled to flee, abandon that cotton air intent on strangulation, the hot waves wiggling up from the blacktop of Boylston, and that inebriated rabble in white and red marching to Fenway in order to commune with their beloveds who had just won the Series—again, goddamn. They were scary soldiers undeterred by heatwaves or, I figured, hydrogen bombs, and I was not a real man: I hardly knew the difference between a touchdown and a homerun, plus my leather belts frequently matched my leather boots and for that reason everyone thought I was homosexual. The white and red waves flooded down Boylston and Newbury and Beacon toward the ballpark where they would await the return of the Red Sox from the place they had won the Series—I don’t know where. I went the other way. There’s more: The Globe had just fired me for inventing a story about a B.C. professor who moonlighted as a call girl in order to double her salary while simultaneously defending female sexual freedom and everything with a womb. It sounded enticing to me but they didn’t think so; my chicanery was discovered the day after the story ran—I was quote-a-derelict-unquote. But it wasn’t much of a scandal—nothing like the Jason Blair debacle at the New York Times—because, really, I wasn’t much of a reporter; my ideas were miniscule and some said medieval. Like most scribes with coitus on the brain, I thought and wrote so incessantly about sex only because I wasn’t having any. But I was not to blame: abnormal autumn heat activates a person’s libido and transforms him into a drooling android eager to lap, lap. Nature [End Page 1] is not kind. Plus—who under heaven wanted another article on Iraq or the buffoonery in D.C.? And I was looking for attention, true, a smack from strangers, anything to distract me from the ennui and the ache I felt gaining fire inside me, disrupting the tunnels and pipes that processed my fast food. I had lost weight recently. Also, I invented the story to try to get the notice of my ex-fiancée who had dumped me hard and from high. As every man knows, when he needs the notice of a woman, he must lie. Various websites informed me that the temperature in Toronto was twenty-five degrees cooler than any place in Massachusetts or indeed in the whole grandiosity that is New England. I made a decision, which was more than I had done in ten days. And so I packed a duffel bag on a Friday morning, cut my measly savings in half, and trekked across the Common and through the swarm of Red Sox drones at Downtown Crossing, each one drunker than the next and it wasn’t even noon. I couldn’t understand what they were chanting or why it mattered, or why I had even moved to this baseball town in the first place. How much longer could I stand to be an outsider in a city where everyone—everyone—knew the names and stats of pitchers and catchers and first basemen? In a city that offered me not the slightest inkling of love? At South Station, very damp and salty with the stuff my body did not want, the thump-thump of my pulse in my right ear, I stood in line and bought a train ticket to Portland, Maine. From there I’d bus it to Canada or else rent a car and then . . . what? I did not know. Be Canadian maybe, whatever that entailed. In my breast was an emotion akin to hope, despite that relentless inferno Boston called weather. And—I will not lie—I was thinking that Canadian women might be more accepting of my average looks and the poverty-level earning power that had landed me a basement broom closet on Beacon Hill. South Station, packed with multi-colored travelers and their lovable tikes, is a lonely place that calls to mind the words mismanagement [End...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œHopkins review/Hopkins reviewSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207