MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379422197 · doi:10.51731/cjht.2023.664

An Overview of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Psychiatric Disorders

2023· article· en· W4379422197 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Health Technologies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacogenomicsGeneralizability theoryMedicineGuidelineGenetic testingHealth carePersonalized medicineTest (biology)PsychiatryPsychologyBioinformaticsPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pharmacogenomic testing is a precision medicine technology that examines genetic variation in medication metabolism. Selected for inclusion in CADTH’s 2023 Watch List, pharmacogenomic testing has the potential to significantly influence the landscape of health care in Canada over the next 5 years. By analyzing an individual’s unique genetic profile, this testing aims to guide personalized treatment strategies that improve therapeutic outcomes, optimize the medication selection process, and enhance patient experiences. The integration of pharmacogenomic testing into clinical practice may pave the way for a more efficient and effective delivery of mental health care. Pharmacogenomic tests for psychiatric disorders that are available in Canada include direct-to-consumer tests — which are paid out of pocket — and tests that are offered as a laboratory service (which may or may not be paid out of pocket). These tests are quite different from each other, including the types and number of genes examined, cost of testing, and methods used for sample collection and analysis. Despite being available for approximately 20 years and that numerous guideline-developing groups and regulators have issued recommendations about the types of pharmacogenomic information that should be used to guide prescribing decisions, pharmacogenomic testing has yet to be integrated into most psychiatric care practices in Canada and worldwide. Although some studies suggest pharmacogenomic testing provides benefits over treatment as usual, the evidence is often conflicting and of limited quality. Concerns related to risk of bias, inconsistency across studies, reproducibility, and generalizability do not allow a clear and consistent interpretation of the results. This Horizon Scan provides an overview of information related to pharmacogenomic testing for psychiatric disorders, a description of some of the published studies, and a summary of some important considerations related to clinician education and training, privacy and confidentiality of health data, health equity, and laboratory capacity should testing become more widely used in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.323
GPT teacher head0.507
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it