MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379424977 · doi:10.1353/see.2008.0083

The Russian Vision: The Art of Ilya Repin by David Jackson (review)

2008· article· en· W4379424977 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosalind P. Blakesley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIlyaExhibitionPaintingSubject (documents)Art historyQuarter (Canadian coin)Visual artsArtHistoryLibrary scienceComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

720 SEER, 86, 4, OCTOBER 2008 Jackson, David. The Russian Vision:The Art ofIlya Repin. BAI, Schoten, 2006. 304 pp. Chronology. Illustrations. Notes. Select bibliography. Index. ?40.00. One of the joys ofworking as an art historian inRussia is the popular accep tance of the subject (in urban centres, at any rate) as an inalienable part of Russian life.Russian schoolchildren visit museums and galleries in their thousands, and vying for top place in the canon ofworks with which they are familiar is a vast canvas of begrimed and dejected men hauling a boat along a river.That the artist of thispainting, Ilya Repin, is so litde known outside Russia has long concerned both Russians and foreign visitors to those collec tionswhere thebest of hisworks are housed. David Jackson's book The Russian Vision: The Art ofIlya Repin is a welcome and timely attempt to redress this problem, rising as itdoes to the challenge of establishing Repin as a major player in nineteenth-century European art. Jackson iswell qualified towrite such a book. Not only has he carried out lengthy research and teaching on the subject, but he was also involved in the exhibition of Repin's paintings at Groninger Museum, Holland, in 2001-02 which attracted over a quarter of a million people, exceeding even the curators' wildest dreams. Queues of visitors snaked around the building throughout the exhibition's duration, and extra carriages were added to trains running between Amsterdam and Groninger to cope with the crowds. Jackson draws on his experience of this extraordinary cultural phenomenon, as well as his extensive knowledge of Repin's oeuvreand of the literature on the artist, to consider Repin's position as primus interpares among Russian artists, and the difficulties of conveying this success abroad. As is the case in his other recent book, Tie Wanderers and CriticalRealism in Nineteenth-Century Russian Painting (Manchester and New York, 2006), Jackson chooses to organize hismaterial thematically,with core chapters on historical scenes, images of peasant life, political paintings and portraits. Such categori zation works well, allowing as it does a comprehensive analysis of the major genres of painting which Repin tackled when he was at the height of his powers (though for some reason Repin's official portraits are considered as a subcategory of political paintings, which implicitly accredits them with political messages which are not necessarily there). Less successful are the accounts of the early years and the twilight of Repin's career, which stand like bookends at either end of the text. The result ant shift from chronological to thematic arrangement necessitates a clumsy three-page preface to chapters three to six,which provides a biographical summary of the major events of Repin's career. The reasoning is understand able: an audience unfamiliar with the subject requires such an introduction to contextualize the discussion ahead. But much of the information in the preface is reiterated where relevant later in the book, and a reader with the mental agility to tackle an unfamiliar subject is likely to be able to negotiate the changes in time and pace which the thematic account requires. Jackson's claim that this is 'the first full critical analysis of [Repin's] vast output by a Western art historian' (p. 10) is questionable. (Elizabeth K. Valkenier's Ilya Repin and the World ofRussian Art,New York, 1990, seems an REVIEWS 721 obvious contender for that title.) Nevertheless, Jackson's determination to give the aesthetic pretensions ofRepin's paintings due weight is admirable. As he righdy points out, Repin's work is ill-served by photographic reproductions, which convey an impression ofpolished naturalism which isoften at odds with the visceral touch of the artist's brush. Jackson counteracts this with some subtle descriptions of the physical construction of an impressive range of works. More could be made of the excellent holdings inprovincial museums inRussia, but of particular merit is the introduction of little-knownpaintings byRepin which have appeared in themajor Western auction houses in recent years. Indeed, the author and his publishers are to be commended for the courageous decision to put the enigmatic Portrait ofLidiya Kuznetsova (1901, private collection) on the dust jacket, rather than seeking refuge behind...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewSame topicSoviet and Russian HistoryFrench-language works237,207