Bibliographic record
Abstract
SEER, Vol. 88,Nos. 1/2,January /April 2010 PART THREE Lindsey Hughes: A Bibliography SIMON DIXON This bibliographylists books and articlespublishedbyLindseyHughes both in her lifetime and posthumously. Though all but three entries have been checked de visu, the listdraws on notes kept inLindsey's own papers, generously supplied by Dr James Cutshall. Reviews have not been included, though a large number of these appeared not only in leading historical periodicals, but also in the Times Literary Supplement, for which Lindsey reviewed Russian theatre and the arts in London formany years. Her numerous encyclopaedia articles ? most notably in theModern Encyclopedia ofRussian and Soviet History, 59 vols and supplements, Gulf Breeze, FL, 1976 ? have likewise been excluded. ABBREVIATIONS CASS Canadian-Amer?can Slavic Studies CSP Canadian Slavonic Papers FOG Forschungen zur osteurop?ischen Geschichte OSP Oxford Slavonic Papers SEERSlavonic and East European Review SGECRJV Study Group onEighteenth-CenturyRussia Newsletter 1976 'Moscow Baroque Architecture: A Study ofOne Aspect ofWesternisa tion in Late Seventeenth-Century Russia', unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge. 'Byelorussian Craftsmen in Seventeenth-Century Russia and their Influence on Muscovite Architecture', Journal ofByelorussian Studies, 3, pp. 327-41. 1977 'Western European Graphic Material as a Source for Moscow Baroque Architecture', SEER, 55, 4, pp. 433-43. LINDSEY HUGHES: A BIBLIOGRAPHY 417 1979 'The Moscow Armoury and Innovations in Seventeenth-Century Muscovite Art', CASS, 13, 1-2, pp. 204-23. 1980 'The 17th-century "Renaissance" inRussia: Western Influences inArt and Architecture5, History Today, February, pp. 41-45. 1981 'Architectural books in Petrine Russia', in Russia and the West in the Eighteenth Century, ed. A. G. Cross, Newtonville, MA, Oriental Research Partners, pp. 101-08. 'Ablesimov's Mel'nik. A Study in Success', SGECRN, 9, pp. 29-40. 1982 '"Moscow Baroque" ? a Controversial Style5, Transactions of the Association ofRussian-American Scholars inUSA, 15, pp. 69-83. Seventeenth-Century Westerniser: Prince Vasily VasiTevich Golitsyn (1643-1714)', Irish Slavonic Studies, 3, pp. 47-58. 'Sophia, Regent of Russia', History Today, July, pp. 10-15. 1983 'Russia's First Architectural Books: A Chapter in Peter the Great's Cultural Revolution', in Russian Avant-Garde Art and Architecture, ed. Catherine Cooke, London, pp. 4-13. 1984 Russia and theWest: The Life of a Seventeenth-Century Westerniser, Prince Vastly VasiVevich Golitsyn (1643-1704), Newtonville, MA, Oriental Research Partners, Russian Biography Series, 14, 129 pp. 1985 'Sofiya Alekseyevna and theMoscow Rebellion of 16825, SEER, 63, 4, PP- 5r?-39 1986 'Sophia, "Autocrat of all theRussias": Titles, Ritual and Eulogy in the Regency of Sophia Alekseevna (1682-89)5, CSP, 28, 3, pp. 266-86. 4i8 LINDSEY HUGHES! A BIBLIOGRAPHY 'N. A. L'vov and the Russian Country House5, in Russia and the World of theEighteenth Century, eds R. P. Bartlett, A. G. Cross and Karen Rasmussen, Columbus, OH, Slavica Publishers, pp. 289-300. 1988 '"Ambitious and Daring above her Sex55: Tsarevna Sophia Alekseevna (1657-1704) in Foreigners5 Accounts5, OSP, New Series, 21, pp. 65-89. 'The Age of Transition: 17th-century Russian Icon-Painting5, in Icons 88, eds Sarah Smyth and Stanford Kingston, Dublin, Veritas Publications, pp. 63-74. 1989 Editor and translator. S. M. Soloviev, A History ofRussia, vol. 25: Rebellion and Reform: Fedor and Sophia i682-i68g, Gulf Breeze, FL, Academic International Press, xxxiv + 276 pp. 1990 Sophia, Regent of Russia 1637-1704, New Haven, CT, and London, Yale University Press, xvii + 345 pp. [Awarded Heidt Prize for best book in Slavic Women's studies, 1991, by theAmerican Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies.] Consultant editor and joint author with Robin Milner-Gulland and Orlando Figes. The Russian Chronicles, London, Century, 480 pp. [Lindsey Hughes contributed 'Britain and Russia: 1000 years ofAnglo Russian relations5, pp. 12-18; 'Imperial Russia 1676-18255, pp. 144-45; 'Russian Renaissance5, pp. 153-55; 'St Petersburg5, pp. 169-71); 'Peter ,p. 183; 'Elizabeth5, p. 193.] 'V. T. Postnikov5s 1687Mission to London: Anglo-Russian Relations in the 1680S in British Sources5, SEER, 68, 3, pp. 447-60. 'Visions of an Imperial Capital5, in Tradition and Revolution inRussian Art, ed. S. Causey, Manchester, Cornerhouse Publications, pp. 174-77. 1991 'The West comes to Russian Architecture5, in Russia and Europe, ed. Paul Dukes, London, Collins and Brown, pp. 24-35. [Reprinted from History...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".