MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379433230 · doi:10.1353/see.2002.0069

Istoriia Russkoi Ameriki, 1732-1867 by N. N. s> Bolkhovitinov (review)

2002· article· en· W4379433230 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Dukes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierState (computer science)NeutralityHistoryEconomic historyPolitical scienceAncient historyGeographyLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REVIEWS 345 Chechens led to soil erosion, siltation, and the spread of malaria; and its efforts to provision the cossack settlements with grain from the lower Volga were inadequate.This forcedthe TerekCossackstojoin in the more developed economy of their ostensible enemies, the Muslim mountain peoples, for their grain, lumber, livestock, cloth, and even their horses and guns, which they obtained throughlegal tradeaswell asthroughsmugglingand raiding.Barrett shows how such exchange 'drewthe Cossacksinto the world of the mountain people, nativized their materialculture, and occasionally led them to subvert state policy', as when cossack trade and smuggling undermined the government 's effortsto tame the mountain people by making them dependent upon the state saltmonopoly (p. II4). Barrett'saccount turnsespeciallypoignant when it describesthe change in Russian military strategy on the North Caucasus frontier in the early nineteenth century. The traditional mode of mountain warfarepractised by the Terek Cossacksagainstthe mountain peoples had been waged for limited objectives containment, retribution, booty, and ransoms. By contrast the war of conquest waged by General Ermolov's army denied mountain communities the opportunity to choose neutrality or mediation and it employed increasingly savage tactics against an ever-widening range of enemies united in defense of theirfaithand culture. Department ofHistory BRIAN DAVIES University ofTexas atSanAntonio Bolkhovitinov, N. N. (ed.) IstoriiaRusskoiAmeriki,I732-I867. Mezhdunarodnyeotnosheniia ,Moscow,3 vols. 1997, 1999, I999. 479, 470, 558 pp. Maps. Illustrations. Tables. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Price unknown. ACADEMICIAN Nikolai Nikolaevich Bolkhovitinov, the doyen of historians of Russian America, acts as general editor for this large-scalecoverage of a vast theme as well as introducing all three volumes and writingsome of the text in all three. All the contributors,includingJames R. Gibson from Canada and Lydia Black from Alaska in addition to several Russians, observe Bolkhovitinov 's own high standards of scholarship with an impressive use of archival sources and full bibliographies.With a colourfulrepresentationof the flag of the Russian-American Company superimposed upon appropriate nautical scenes on each of the dust-covers,thisisvery nearlyas evocative and thorough a treatmentof its subjectas anybody could wish for. While the epic tale of the activitiesof a motley host of seafarers,merchants and promyshlenniki began with the expeditions of Vitus Bering first commissioned by Peterthe Great in I 725, therewas a prologue compounded of myth and legend concerning the 'stone barrier',the 'impassablenose' and the 'big land' beyond before the Dutchman N. C. Witsen (thoroughly investigated elsewhere by Bruno Naarden) stood out among those igniting Peter'sinterest in the subjectof linksbetween the continents of Eurasiaand North America. Alaskawas 'discovered'by Gvozdev and Fedorovin 1732 and the Northwest of America by Bering in his second expedition along with Chirikov in 174.I But the foundation of the firstpermanent settlementsacrossthe waterwas not 346 SEER, 8o, 2, 2002 made by the Shelikhovbrothersuntil I783-86, afterwhich consolidation was achieved under Baranov. An especially significant feature of eighteenthcentury activity was contact with the indigenous peoples which took on two main forms: trade for their furs;and negotiations for their souls. Under the latter heading, scholarly analysis of missionary operations was virtuallynonexistent throughout the Soviet period. Now, the route to New Valaam can be more completely charted before, during and afterthe firstsubstantialmission of I793-94. (In fact, the projected monasterywas never built, but the smaller settlementof St Herman became known as New Valaam in its stead.) A central part in the story, the rise and fall of the Russian-American Company, is given full coverage here. Activitiesin Californiaas well as in the North-West are scrutinized afresh by his colleagues, while Bolkhovitinov himself examines in detail Russian contacts with Hawaii, with renewed focus on the adventures of Dr Georg Anton Schaffer. Full due is also given to pertinent international relations, the Nootka Sound crisis, the conventions with the USA and Great Britain of I824 and I825 respectively, and remote ramificationsof the Crimean Warleading towardsthe sale of Alaska. Instead of a conclusion, Academician Bolkhovitinov rightly itemizes the distortionsin many of the Soviet publications on Russian America as well as the enormous difficultiesthat he himself encountered in publishing some of his own workbefore I99I, inparticularconcerning the saleof Alaska.He then goes on to dismisspost-I99I ultra-nationalistdemandsforthe returnofAlaska while patriotically defending the renewal made in i990 by the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewSame topicSoviet and Russian HistoryFrench-language works237,207