MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379470066 · doi:10.5430/wjel.v13n6p339

Implementation and Challenges of Home-Based Teaching and Learning (PdPR) in Religious Schools in Kubang Pasu, Kedah

2023· article· en· W4379470066 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rukhaiyah Abd Wahab, Sharifah Hayaati Binti Syed Ismail, Rafidah Mohamad Cusairi

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of English Language · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Utara Malaysia
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)IslamCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Face (sociological concept)Mathematics educationPolitical scienceMedical educationPublic relationsPsychologySociologyMedicineGeographySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Covid-19 has significantly impacted many sectors worldwide, including the education sector. This impact also affects educators in implementing home-based teaching and learning (PdPR). PdPR is implemented to ensure that students are not left behind even though the world is going through the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, research is carried out where the research questions and objectives are about PdPR implementation and challenges. Surveys are done in five religious schools in Kubang Pasu district, which involves 77 teachers. The research found that teachers still carry out PdPR even though they face many challenges such as limited interactions with students, lack of student attention, and limited internet access. To successfully implement PdPR, teachers need support from all parties, including parents, students, NGOs and the government. Thus, the research finding is crucial to the schools and Islamic education sector to study and improve PdPR to achieve educational objectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of English LanguageSame topicEducational Practices and ChallengesFrench-language works237,207