MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379472531 · doi:10.4028/p-050q7w

Electroluminescence Spectra of a Gate Switched MOSFET at Cryogenic and Room Temperatures Agree with Ab Initio Calculations of 4H-SiC/SiO<sub>2</sub>-Interface Defects

2023· article· en· W4379472531 on OpenAlexaff
Magdalena Weger, Dominik Biermeier, Maximilian W. Feil, Jonathon Cottom, Michel Bockstedte, Gregor Pobegen

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
FundersÖsterreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
KeywordsMaterials scienceMOSFETElectroluminescenceAb initioAtomic physicsSpectral lineAb initio quantum chemistry methodsOptoelectronicsVoltageNanotechnologyPhysicsTransistorMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To reach the theoretical performance limit of 4HSiCMOSFETs the SiC/SiO2interfacedefects along the inversion channel need to be fully identified in order to be avoided. We employa measurement technique that allows to observe energetically resolved trap states at the SiC/SiO2 interface by measuring the electrolumiscence of a gate pulsed MOSFET. The spectra are recorded at room and cryogenic temperatures with a spectrometer and two different amplitudes of the gate pulse. Comparison of the results to literature allows for identification of the L1 line of the D1 center with an energy of 2.9 eV and suggests donoracceptorpair recombination or Z1/2 to be responsible for the emission around 2.5 eV. Ionization energies of PbC and related vacancy centers determined via ab initio calculations show similar results as the experimental data and provide a possible classification of the trap level around 1.8 eV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207