MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379509077 · doi:10.1097/paf.0000000000000849

Fatal Rapunzel Syndrome

2023· article· en· W4379509077 on OpenAlexaff
A. Żyła, Rebekah Jacques

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBezoarSurgeryPhysical examinationMagnetic resonance imagingMelenaEtiologyAnorexiaVomitingRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: We report a rare case of a young child, younger than10 years, who died of complications related to trichophagia and multiple gastrointestinal trichobezoars. One year before death, the child's clinical history yielded a diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia, believed to be related to poor diet, and alopecia areata, the etiology of which was unknown. Two weeks before death, the child presented with complaints of intermittent "flu-like" symptoms and vomiting. The child reported abdominal pain, anorexia, and fatigue on the night before death. The next morning, the child ate breakfast and was subsequently discovered unresponsive.On external examination, there were areas of thinning head hair. Postmortem computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and internal examination revealed 3 distinct trichobezoars, occupying the stomach, jejunum, and ileum. This was complicated by small bowel obstructions and perforations due to the trichobezoars. The cause of death was peritonitis secondary to small bowel perforations due to small bowel obstruction with multiple trichobezoars. This is the first case report to demonstrate the utility of postmortem computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in characterizing the nature and extent of trichobezoars in a fatal case of Rapunzel syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & PathologySame topicIntestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsFrench-language works237,207