Effect of IMB model nursing on patients’ self-perceived burden and cognitive function
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a nursing intervention based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model(IMB Model) in patients with chronic heart failure. An average of 100 patients with chronic HF admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were divided into two groups. 50 patients in the experimental group were given IMB model care, and 50 patients in the control group underwent routine care measures. Patients were evaluated both before and after the intervention using the self-perceived burden scale and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale. The experimental results showed that after 6 months of intervention, the self-perceived burden scores of both groups decreased, with the experimental group significantly lower than the control group. The cognitive function was higher in the experimental group than in the control group. This experiment concludes that the IMB model nursing intervention can relieve the burden of chronic heart failure, and improve the cognitive function of the disease in patients with chronic heart failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it