MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379516422 · doi:10.3138/cjfs-2022-0049

The Revisability of Film History

2023· article· fr· W4379516422 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jerry White

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé : Dans cette brève analyse suscitée par la publication récente de l’ouvrage de Caroline Zéau Le Cinéma direct : un art de la mise en scène, je soutiens que les généralistes qui abordent la naissance de l’histoire du cinéma, spécialement dans un contexte éducatif, ont beaucoup à gagner d’une approche « parallèle » de concepts comme « les débuts du cinéma ». Comme Zéau nous permet de le comprendre, on pourrait dire la même chose, en partie, de l’évolution du cinéma direct, ou cinéma-vérité. Les œuvres de Mitchell et Kenyon et les séquences ethnographiques filmées par Zora Neale Hurston illustrent cette idée de façon convaincante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207