Illuminating Dark Proteins using Reactome Pathways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Limited knowledge about a substantial portion of protein coding genes, known as "dark" proteins, hinders our understanding of their functions and potential therapeutic applications. To address this, we leveraged Reactome, the most comprehensive, open source, open-access pathway knowledgebase, to contextualize dark proteins within biological pathways. By integrating multiple resources and employing a random forest classifier trained on 106 protein/gene pairwise features, we predicted functional interactions between dark proteins and Reactome-annotated proteins. We then developed three scores to measure the interactions between dark proteins and Reactome pathways, utilizing enrichment analysis and fuzzy logic simulations. Correlation analysis of these scores with an independent single-cell RNA sequencing dataset provided supporting evidence for this approach. Furthermore, systematic natural language processing (NLP) analysis of over 22 million PubMed abstracts and manual checking of the literature associated with 20 randomly selected dark proteins reinforced the predicted interactions between proteins and pathways. To enhance the visualization and exploration of dark proteins within Reactome pathways, we developed the Reactome IDG portal, deployed at https://idg.reactome.org, a web application featuring tissue-specific protein and gene expression overlay, as well as drug interactions. Our integrated computational approach, together with the user-friendly web platform, offers a valuable resource for uncovering potential biological functions and therapeutic implications of dark proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".