MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

POS0378 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN METABOLIC SYNDROME AND KNEE PAIN IN MIDDLE-AGED ADULTS OVER 10-13 YEARS

2023· article· en· W4379523313 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ambrish Singh, Brooklyn J. Fraser, Alison Venn, Leigh Blizzard, Graeme Jones, Changhai Ding, Benny Antony

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNovartis Pharma
KeywordsMedicineMetabolic syndromeAssociation (psychology)Knee painPhysical therapyKnee JointInternal medicineOsteoarthritisObesitySurgeryAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by an increased waist circumference, dyslipidaemia (elevated triglycerides and reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL)), hypertension and hyperglycaemia. MetS has been suggested as having a role in osteoarthritis (OA) pathogenesis. Few studies have described the association of MetS with joint pain in older adults with OA; however, none has described the association between MetS and knee pain in a middle-aged adult population. Objectives We aimed to describe the association of MetS and trajectories of MetS over 10-13 years with knee symptoms in general population-based middle-aged adults. Methods Fasting blood biochemistry, waist circumference and blood pressure measures collected during the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health (CDAH)-1 study (year:2004-6; n = 2447) and at 10-13 year follow-up at CDAH-3 (n = 1549) were used to define MetS using the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definition. Knee symptoms were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scale at the CDAH-3 follow-up (mid-adulthood). Univariable and multivariable (adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI)) zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) regression models were used for analysis. Results Overall, the prevalence of MetS increased from 8% (mean age:31.48±2.60; female:52.06%) to 13% (mean age: 44±2.90; female: 53.78%) over 10-13 years. Four MetS trajectories were identified—‘No MetS’ (85.01%); ‘Improved MetS’ (2.14%), ‘Incident MetS’ (8.81%), and ‘Persistent MetS, (4.04%). The presence of MetS at any point, compared to no MetS, was significantly associated with worse knee symptoms at follow-up. Notably, ‘Incident MetS’ was most strongly associated with knee symptoms [RoM: 1.56;95%CI: 1.48,1.65] and pain [RoM:1.52;95%CI:1.37,1.70] at follow-up (Table 1). Conclusion In a middle-aged population-based sample, there was an independent positive association between MetS and knee symptoms. The MetS developed in mid-adulthood was most strongly associated with knee symptoms compared to those who had MetS in young adulthood or at both time points. Acknowledgements AS is supported by the International Graduate Research Scholarship, University of Tasmania. Disclosure of Interests None Declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiabetes Management and Research→French-language works237,207→