MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379528655 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2023.3278110

Large-Scale Data-Driven Optimization in Deep Modeling With an Intelligent Decision-Making Mechanism

2023· article· en· W4379528655 on OpenAlexaff
Dayu Tan, Yansen Su, Xin Peng, Hongtian Chen, Chun-Hou Zheng, Xingyi Zhang, Weimin Zhong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPyramid (geometry)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceBlock (permutation group theory)Channel (broadcasting)Feature (linguistics)Data miningDeep learningRepresentation (politics)Scale (ratio)Feature extractionConvolution (computer science)Machine learningArtificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on building an intelligent decision-making attention mechanism in which the channel relationship and conduct feature maps among specific deep Dense ConvNet blocks are connected to each other. Thus, develop a novel freezing network with a pyramid spatial channel attention mechanism (FPSC-Net) in deep modeling. This model studies how specific design choices in the large-scale data-driven optimization and creation process affect the balance between the accuracy and effectiveness of the designed deep intelligent model. To this end, this study presents a novel architecture unit, which is termed as the "Activate-and-Freeze" block on popular and highly competitive datasets. In order to extract informative features by fusing spatial and channel-wise information together within local receptive fields and boost the representation power, this study constructs a Dense-attention module (pyramid spatial channel (PSC) attention) to perform feature recalibration, and through the PSC attention to model the interdependence among convolution feature channels. We join the PSC attention module in the activating and back-freezing strategy to search for one of the most important parts of the network for extraction and optimization. Experiments on various large-scale datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can achieve substantially better performance for improving the ConvNets representation power than the other state-of-the-art deep models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CyberneticsSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207