Joint Mode Selection and Resource Allocation for D2D and Femtocell Users in Dense Heterogeneous Networks with Full Frequency Reuse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the problem of joint mode selection and resource allocation for D2D and femtocell users in a three-tier dense heterogeneous network in which all the users can reuse the spectrum. The goal is to maximize their total weighted sum rate, subject to minimum rate requirements and maximum tolerable interference on the cellular system. Since the spectrum can be fully reused, the co-tier and cross-tier interferences among the users result in a mixed integer non-linear, non-convex program that is difficult to solve directly. Using insights into the structure of the interference, we derive a close, conservative approximation of the joint problem that has a convex relaxation that is tight. That enables good solutions to the joint problem to be obtained using a customized iterative algorithm employing the Lagrange dual decomposition method. Since the proposed iterative scheme is semi-distributed, the signaling overhead is mitigated. To further reduce the computational complexity, a low-complexity (primal) decomposition-based method is also introduced, in which we select the transmission mode heuristically based on the traffic level in the network, and then sequentially perform admission control, power control, and sub-channel allocation for the femtocell users and D2D users. Our simulation results indicate that the proposed iterative and heuristic algorithms, on average, achieve around 94% and 82% of the sum rate of the optimal Branch & Bound method, respectively, and do so at much lower computational costs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".