Keterlibatan Ayah dalam Pengasuhan Pada Remaja
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Keterlibatan ayah pada remaja dalam pengasuhan adalah upaya seberapa besar keterlibatan ayah dalam aktivitas, berkontak langsung dan memberikan dukungan pada remaja. Dukungan dari keluarga sangat penting dalam pengasuhan khususnya ayah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat gambaran keterlibatan ayah dalam pengasuhan pada remaja. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu kuantitatif dengan rancangan deskriptif sederhana. Jumlah sampel pada penelitian ini yaitu 110 remaja di wilayah Kecamatan Bukit Raya Kota Pekanbaru. Pengambilan sampel pada penelitian ini yaitu menggunakan metode snowball sampling. Pengambilan data menggunakan kuesioner. Analisis penelitian ini menggunakan univariat dengan penyajian distribusi frekuensi dan persentase. Hasil penelitian ini didapatkan bahwa keterlibatan ayah dalam pengasuhan dalam kategori tinggi berjumlah 98 orang (90%). Perawat berperan penting dalam memberikan pendidikan kesehatan kepada orang tua tentang pentingnya keterlibatan ayah dalam pengasuhan remaja. Kata Kunci: Keterlibatan Ayah Dalam Pengasuhan, Remaja.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".