MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379531651 · doi:10.4000/palethnologie.9080

Implications taphonomiques de l’utilisation de l’os comme combustible

2010· article· fr· W4379531651 on OpenAlex
Eugène Morin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalethnologie · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article explore les effets de l’utilisation de l’os comme combustible sur la représentation squelettique. Les données du gisement paléolithique de Saint-Césaire montrent que cette activité peut présenter une signature archéologique semblable à celle de la conservation différentielle. En effet, les os qui ont été les plus fréquemment brûlés dans ce gisement sont ceux qui sont les moins denses et qui contiennent le plus de graisse. L’analyse de ce site suggère également une identification différentielle des restes spongieux brûlés entre taxons de petite et de grande taille corporelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it