Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous analysons les stratégies stylistiques employées par Andrea Zanzotto pour la représentation des paysages en nous concentrant notamment sur ses premiers recueils, de Dietro il paesaggio (1951) à Il Galateo in Bosco (1978). D’abord, nous identifions le recours à la défamiliarisation, à la stratification symbolique et à la poly-isotopie textuelle, dans le cadre d’une poétique du refoulement. Puis, nous analysons comment l’usage complémentaire de ces stratégies textuelles devient plus explicite et évolue vers l’allégorie et le paysage métapoétique. Enfin, nous observons la création d’un véritable paysage allégorique et patrimonialisant par le biais de ces stratégies. Dans toutes ces étapes, pour le poète il s’agit de déconstruire une hiérarchie héritée afin de reconstruire une relation nouvelle à travers l’écriture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".