MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

POS0226 APREMILAST REDUCES INFLAMMATION AS MEASURED BY MRI OF THE HAND IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: PRIMARY RESULTS FROM THE PHASE 4 MOSAIC STUDY

2023· article· en· W4379534372 on OpenAlexaff
Mikkel Østergaard, Walter P. Maksymowych, Mikael Boesen, R. Lambert, Guillermo J. Valenzuela, M Bubb, Olga Kubassova, Jay P. Reddy, Stephen Colgan, Yuri M. Klyachkin, Cynthia Deignan, L. Tang, Maria Paris, Philip J. Mease

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAmgen
KeywordsMedicineApremilastPsoriatic arthritisDactylitisEnthesitisSynovitisInternal medicineClinical endpointPsoriasisTenosynovitisArthritisSurgeryDermatologyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is characterized by inflammatory arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and spondylitis. Apremilast is an oral immunomodulating phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of PsA. The impact of apremilast on objective measures of inflammation and structural progression of PsA has not yet been characterized. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of apremilast 30 mg BID (APR) on inflammation measured by dedicated MRI of the hand. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of APR on inflammation and imaging outcomes and the safety profile of APR in this setting. Methods MOSAIC (NCT03783026) was a phase 4, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study in patients (pts) with active PsA (≥3 months but ≤5 years since diagnosis, meeting CASPAR criteria for PsA) evaluating APR as monotherapy or in combination with stable methotrexate. Pts were treated with APR for 48 weeks and had MRI of the hand (contrast-enhanced) performed at baseline (BL), Week 24, and Week 48. All images were read and adjudicated by 2 experienced readers blinded to clinical information and time of acquisition. The primary endpoint was change from BL in the composite score of hand bone marrow edema (BME), synovitis, and tenosynovitis in fingers 2–5, as assessed by the PsA MRI Score (PsAMRIS) at Week 24. Total inflammation score, comprised of BME, synovitis, tenosynovitis, and periarticular inflammation in fingers, was also assessed. Structural progression was assessed by the total hand damage score (determined by bone erosion and bone proliferation in fingers 2–5). Subgroup analyses based on BL disease activity as measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) were performed for key endpoints. Results A total of 122 pts enrolled and received APR. Mean age was 47 years, 55% were women, and mean duration of PsA was 1.9 years. The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included 98 pts evaluable for the primary endpoint (having BL and Week 24 data); 4 had major protocol deviations and 94 were evaluable as part of the per protocol (PP) population. The least-squares (LS) mean (95% CI) change from BL in the composite inflammation score of BME, synovitis, and tenosynovitis as assessed by PsAMRIS (FAS) was -2.32 (-4.73, 0.09) at Week 24 and -2.91 (-5.45, -0.37) at Week 48 (Figure 1). In the PP population, the LS mean (95% CI) change from BL in the composite score at Weeks 24 and 48 indicated a significant reduction of disease activity (Figure 1). Significant improvements from BL were seen in total inflammation scores (BME + synovitis + tenosynovitis + periarticular inflammation) in the FAS (Figure 1). The structural outcome indicated by the total hand damage score, including bone erosion, showed no significant change from BL to Week 48 (Figure 1). Pts also experienced significant improvements from BL in cDAPSA at Weeks 24 and 48 (Figure 1). Subgroup analyses based on disease activity at BL showed significant improvements from BL in inflammation in pts with moderate disease activity (ModDA; cDAPSA score >13 to ≤27) and no significant change from BL in total damage (Figure 1). Though it was insignificant, pts with high disease activity (HDA; cDAPSA score >27) did have improvement from BL in inflammation indices (Figure 1). Common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea (33.6%), nausea (12.3%), headache (10.7%), nasopharyngitis (7.4%), and dyspepsia (6.6%). No new safety signals were identified. Conclusion Pts with PsA treated with APR had improvements in both clinical indices and objective MRI indices of inflammation assessed by PsAMRIS in the target hand at Week 24 and Week 48, confirming an effect of APR on clinical and inflammatory manifestations of PsA. Pts with ModDA seemed to have greater improvement from BL in MRI inflammation scores than pts with HDA. No significant structural progression was observed. These results offer important insights on the effect of apremilast in PsA and highlight the value of using MRI and PsAMRIS as measures of inflammatory disease activity and change following treatment. Acknowledgements This study was funded by Amgen Inc. Writing support was funded by Amgen Inc. and provided by Christina Mulvihill, PharmD, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, and Scott Houck, PhD, employee of and stockholder in Amgen Inc. Disclosure of Interests Mikkel Østergaard Speakers bureau: speaker and/or consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, Consultant of: speaker and/or consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Received research grants from AbbVie, Amgen Inc., BMS, Merck, Celgene, and Novartis, Walter P Maksymowych Consultant of: Received consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: grant/research support from AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Employee of: chief medical officer of CARE Arthritis Limited, Mikael Boesen Shareholder of: reports stock ownership in Image Analysis Group, Speakers bureau: speaker and/or consultancy fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Image Analysis Group, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: speaker and/or consultancy fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Image Analysis Group, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Received grants from AbbVie, Celgene, and Novartis, Robert G Lambert Consultant of: Received consulting fees from Calyx, CARE Arthritis Limited, and Image Analysis Group, Guillermo Valenzuela Speakers bureau: speakers bureau for AbbVie, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Centocor, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Horizon, Janssen, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacia, Radius, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and UCB, Consultant of: consultant for AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Esaote, Exagen, Genentech, Gilead, Global Health Living, Horizon, Image Analysis Group, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Mallinckrodt and Novartis, Michael Bubb Grant/research support from: Research grants from Amgen Inc., BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB., Olga Kubassova Employee of: Employment by and stock ownership in Image Analysis Group, Jyotsna Reddy Shareholder of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Employee of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Stephen Colgan Shareholder of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Employee of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Yuri Klyachkin Shareholder of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Employee of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Cynthia Deignan Shareholder of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Employee of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Lihua Tang Shareholder of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Employee of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Maria Paris Shareholder of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Employee of: Employment by and stock ownership in Amgen Inc., Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: speakers bureau for AbbVie, Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB., Consultant of: consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim and GlaxoSmithKline, Grant/research support from: Grant/research support and consultant for AbbVie, Amgen Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, and UCB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→