MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379536362 · doi:10.21991/cf29454

A Minimalistic Approach to Severing the British Royal Family from Canada’s Constitution

2023· article· en· W4379536362 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Tim Sheaff

Bibliographic record

VenueConstitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonarchyQueen (butterfly)ConstitutionConstitutional monarchyApprehensionLawDoveAncient historyHistoryGenealogyPolitical sciencePoliticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a survey conducted prior to the Queen’s passing, 51 percent of respondents affirmed that the country “should not remain a part of the monarchy in coming generations.” While 55 percent of those surveyed supported the country continuing as a constitutional monarchy so long as the Queen reigned, only 34 percent expressed the same once Charles was to become King. Time will tell whether this general apprehension about Charles III will continue, but given the negative public standing of the new King and the monarchy in general, the question is bound to arise: how can the British royal family be removed from Canada’s constitutional architecture?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConstitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnelSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207