Le rôle des tribunaux ontariens dans la reconnaissance des traits socioreligieux amish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
socioreligious practices at the local level.Two cases are examined to explore this hypothesis, both concerning municipal law: Mornington (Township) v. Kuepfer and Stoll v. Kawartha Lakes (City) Committee of Adjustment.In the first case, the Amish community was granted the right to keep horses in a municipality where a by-law formally forbade such keeping.In the second case, the Amish community was granted the right to build a second house on farmland where such construction was forbidden.In both situations, the Courts, acting as a source of State authority, took into account the religious freedom afforded to this religious community, thus contributing to the acknowledgement of these specific socioreligious aspects of the Amish community.Los amish están presentes en el sur de Ontario desde 1822.Este grupo religioso minoritario manifiesta ciertos rasgos sociorreligiosos únicos que forman parte de su normatividad (Ordnung), como el uso de caballos para los desplazamientos y los trabajos agrícolas y la comunalización intergeneracional de los espacios de vida familiar.Estas mismas características han surgido como elementos centrales de algunas decisiones de los tribunales de Ontario.Cabe preguntarse si los tribunales de Ontario han contribuido al reconocimiento de las especificidades sociorreligiosas y normativas de los amish.En caso afirmativo, ¿a qué nivel y en qué medida?La hipótesis planteada en el contexto de este estudio postula que los tribunales han influido positivamente en el reconocimiento de los rasgos sociorreligiosos de los amish a nivel local.Los dos casos considerados para apoyar esta hipótesis (Mornington [Township] contra Kuepfer y Stoll contra Kawartha Lakes [City] Committee of Adjustment) se refieren al derecho municipal.En el primer caso, los amish obtuvieron el derecho a tener caballos en un municipio donde un reglamento lo prohibía formalmente.En el segundo caso, los amish ganaron el derecho a construir una
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".