MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379598193 · doi:10.7202/1098897ar

Insomnie et risque suicidaire dans les troubles de la personnalité du groupe B : une étude comparative transversale

2023· article· fr· W4379598193 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Magali Tisseyre, Alexandre Hudon, Charles‐Édouard Giguère, Annie Vallières, Célyne Bastien, Felix-Antoine Berubé, Lionel Cailhol

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté mentale au Québec · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de QuébecUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective The suicide mortality rate among people suffering from cluster B personality disorders is estimated at approximately 20%. High occurrence of comorbid depression and anxiety, as well as substance abuse, are known contributors to this risk. Not only have recent studies indicated that insomnia may be a suicide risk factor, but it is also thought to be highly prevalent in this clinical group. However, the mechanisms explaining this association are still unknown. It has been suggested that emotion dysregulation and impulsivity may mediate the link between insomnia and suicide. In order to better understand the association between insomnia and suicide in cluster B personality disorders, it is important to consider the influence of comorbidities. The aims of this study were first to compare the levels of insomnia symptoms and impulsivity between a group of patients with cluster B personality disorder and a healthy control group and second, to measure the relationships between insomnia, impulsivity, anxiety, depression, substance abuse and suicide risk within the cluster B personality disorder sample. Methods Cross-sectional study including 138 patients (mean age = 33.74; 58.7% women) with cluster B personality disorder. Data from this group were extracted from a Quebec-based mental health institution database (Signature bank: www.banquesignature.ca) and were compared to that of 125 healthy subjects matched for age and sex, with no history of personality disorder. Patient diagnosis was determined by diagnostic interview upon admission to a psychiatric emergency service. Anxiety, depression, impulsivity and substance abuse were also assessed at that time point via self-administered questionnaires. Participants from the control group visited the Signature center to complete the questionnaires. A correlation matrix and multiple linear regression models were used to explore relations between variables. Results In general, more severe insomnia symptoms and higher levels of impulsivity distinguished the group of patients with cluster B personality from the sample of healthy subjects, although groups did not differ on total sleep time. When all variables were included as predictors in a linear regression model to estimate suicide risk, subjective sleep quality, lack of premeditation, positive urgency, depression level and substance use were significantly associated with higher scores on the Suicidal Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R). The model explained 46.7% of the variance of scores at the SBQ-R. Conclusion This study yields preliminary evidence indicating the possible implication of insomnia and impulsivity in suicide risk for individuals with cluster B personality disorder. It is proposed that this association seems to be independent of comorbidity and substance use levels. Future studies may shed light on the possible clinical relevance of addressing insomnia and impulsivity in this clinical population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté mentale au QuébecSame topicPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyFrench-language works237,207