Services et traitements offerts aux personnes ayant un trouble de personnalité limite : état de situation au Québec et perspectives d’avenir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives People with borderline personality disorder experience significant health challenges, both in terms of their mental and physical health, resulting in significant functional repercussions. In Quebec and elsewhere in the world, it is reported that the services in place are often poorly adapted or inaccessible. The purpose of this study was to document the current situation in the different regions of Quebec for clients with borderline personality disorder, to describe the main challenges associated with the implementation of services for this clientele, and to identify possible recommendations to meet the needs of this clientele applicable in different practice settings. Method The design used was a qualitative single case study, with descriptive and exploratory aims. Twenty-three interviews were conducted in most Quebec regions with resources working in various CIUSSSs, CISSSs and non-merged institutions offering adult mental health services. In addition, where available, clinical programming documents were consulted. Mixed data analyses were conducted to provide insights based on different types of settings: urban, peripheral, and remote regions. Results Findings show that in all regions, recognized psychotherapeutic approaches are integrated but tend to need to be adapted. In addition, there is a desire to develop a continuum of care and services and some projects are already underway. Difficulties in implementing these projects and harmonizing services on the territory, due in part to financial and human resource issues, are frequently reported. Territorial issues are also to be considered. Conclusion Enhanced organizational support and the creation of clear guidelines to facilitate the development of borderline personality disorder services would be recommended, as well as the validation of rehabilitation programs and brief treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".