MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379617432 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2004.a827453

Mon cher grand fou …: lettres à Marcel Carbotte 1974–79 by Gabrielle Roy (review)

2004· article· fr· W4379617432 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosemary Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyArtHistoryHumanitiesPsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MLRy 99.1, 2004 209 for communication and cognition in writing will also find much of interest here. The debate on this could have gained furtherin focus from a more extended conclusion to balance the opening chapter, but this study offersthroughout a sense of invigorating dialogue with, and challenge to, received ideas. University of St Andrews David Gascoigne Mon cher grandfou . . .: lettresd Marcel Carbotte 1947-79. By Gabrielle Roy. Ed. by Sophie Marcotte in collaboration with Francois Ricard and Jane Everett. Montreal: Boreal. 2001. 826 pp. C$34.95. ISBN 2-7646-0123-9. When Gabrielle Roy met Marcel Carbotte in May 1947, she was arguably at the height of her fame, as her firstnovel, Bonheur d'occasion (1945), was acclaimed successively in French- and English-speaking Canada, in France, and in the USA. A few months after meeting in Manitoba, the couple married and left Canada for France, where Marcel completed his medical training, and in 1950 they settled in Quebec, where they lived forthe rest of their lives. Roy's letters to Marcel Carbotte, edited by Sophie Marcotte, cover the period between their firstbrief separation until 1979, the year in which Roy suffered a firstheart attack and ill health put an end to her travels. Over the thirty-twoyears covered in this correspondence the couple had established a pattern of life that suited Roy's needs, a pattern of regular and necessary separations, accompanied by the equally necessary contact by letter or telephone. She would leave Quebec for several months of each year in search of winter sunshine, of new landscapes, of peace and quiet to rest, observe, read and write, often relying on the care of undemanding but dedicated friends. Marcel was usually leftat home working, although occasionally he would travel to join Gabrielle, take a holiday in Europe, or visit his family in Winnipeg. This is the context in which the 485 letters were written. (Carbotte's own letters are not included in the volume but can be read in Sophie Marcotte'sPh.D. thesis, 'Gabrielle Roy epistoliere.. .: la correspondance avec Marcel Carbotte' (McGill University, 2000).) One might well expect such a wealth of letters to be a revealing account of the couple's relationship. Equally, since it was Roy's wish that these letters and those she wrote to her sister Bernadette (Ma chere petitesoeur, ed. by Francois Ricard (Montreal: Boreal, 1988)) be published, one might imagine that the correspondence would give an insight into Roy's literary works. On both counts the letters disappoint one's expectations. As a reader, one gains a certain level of intimacy with Roy, with her tastes, the pleasure she takes in discovering landscapes, vegetation, and wildlife. At the level of reportage, travel writing, and the anecdotal, her writing is lively and perceptive. At a more mundane level there is much discussion of their respective states of health, their respective financial positions, diet, and mutual acquaintances. Roy repeatedly chides Marcel for his failure to write as frequently or copiously as she would like. Yet generally the tone is very guarded, as if her status, and perhaps her aim for eventual publication, have imposed a degree of censorship on the content. There is, for example, no direct allusion to Marcel's homosexuality or to his long-term relationship with a younger man. Nor does Roy use the correspondence as a means to discuss in any detail her writing, her work in progress, or her plans forfuture works. Rather, the letters offeran alternative form of autobiographical writing. Whereas La Detresse et I'enchantement (Montreal: Boreal, 1996) and Le Temps qui m'a manque (Montreal: Boreal, 1997) cover the firsthalf of her life taking us up to 1943, this volume of correspondence charts the second half of her life. It also gives us some insight into this habit of letter-writing,a necessary part 210 Reviews of Roy's daily routine, an exercice de style, as Marcotte perceptively comments, and perhaps also an exercise in the self-presentation of a public persona. University of Nottingham Rosemary Chapman For Fear of the Fire: Joan of Are and the Limits of Subjectivity. By Francoise Meltzer. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. 2001. x...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207