MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379617574 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2001.0236

(review)

2001· article· en· W4379617574 on OpenAlex
William Brooks

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirTheme (computing)PrerogativeHonourContext (archaeology)HistoryState (computer science)RhetoricArtHumanitiesLawPoliticsPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt historyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MLR, 96.4, 200 MLR, 96.4, 200 La Vengeance dans la Litteratured'AncienRegime. Ed. by ERIC MECHOULAN. (Paragraphes ).Montreal:Departement d'EtudesFranCaises, Universitede Montreal. 2000. 191 pp. $20. Revenge is omnipresent in French literature of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. From tragedy to novel, from memoir to short story; from duel to assassination, from restoring a reputation to defending one's honour, the theme occurs in countless incarnations across most types of writing. And yet important changes take place, over thisperiod, in literaryattitudestowardsrevenge. In order to head offthe cycle of revenge killing,justice becomes increasinglythe prerogative of civilized State, ratherthan furiousindividual. Even a Saint-Simon, memorably convinced that his aristocratichonour has been impugned by the elevation of royal bastards,has to seekredressbyjudicial means. These ten essaysseekto examine the changing face of revenge in the literaryworksof the period. We have studiesof the legal status of seventeenth-century revenge and of the role of consciousness in revenge; we have the rhetoric of revenge, the link between rank and revenge and the scope for satisfactory revenge achieved through the courts; and we have Diderot's symbolic use of the word 'vengeance' to characterize the moral equality between 'savages'and conquering Europeans,whereas in realityonly equals could take revenge on each other. Perhaps the most unexpected and in some ways the most interestingof these essaysis Rachel Lauthelier's'Pathologieet vengeance dans quelques tragedies de la premiere moitie du I7e siecle'. Studying revenge in the context of humoral medicine, the author demonstrates the association, in writers such as Hardy, Rotrou and Tristanl'Hermite, between atrabiliousmelancholy and a morbid desire for vengeance. She might also have mentioned the more familiar case of Oreste, in Racine's Andromaque, but that would be a quibble. As an antidote to TheThree Musketeers, thiscollection workswell. We areallowed to view frommany angles the dynamic of the moment when the duel fell from grace as a means of seeking revenge;when honour became a purely personal matter and fightingfor it with sword or pistol came to be regarded as an archaic expression of vanity and presumption. If the hero of Horacecan justify taking bloody revenge on his own sister,Candide reactsto provocation by cultivatinghis garden. UNIVERSITY OFLEEDS DAVIDSHAW Moliere, Le Mariageforce. Ed. by JULIA PREST. (Textes Litteraires, 109) Exeter: University ofExeter Press. 999. xxxiv + 58 pp. ?I2.99. Although Claude Abraham and Stephen Fleckhave swept away the old truismthat comedies-ballets represent a paving stone on the road from respectable theatre to deviant opera, modern scholarsstilldo not commonly engage with the issuesraised by dance and song. Setting aside Raymond Picard'sdefeatistassertionthat they lie beyond the apprehension of literary scholars, Julia Prest discusses what can be gleaned from the admittedly incomplete musical and choreographical evidence in respect of Le Mariage force, Moliere's second comedie-ballet, and offers what I am inclined to call the firstholistic appreciation of it. In the course of her study, Prest not only demonstrates that Moliere conceived it as an integrated whole, in other words, not as a play with crudelyinterpolatedballet interludes,but also shows how much its reliance on the fusion of differentart formswas designed to please Louis XIV. So importantwas thatfusion, indeed, that, when Moliere performedthe work in his own theatre in I664 and found the expense of employing dancers and musicians too great, he chose to withdraw it rather than scale it down. When he La Vengeance dans la Litteratured'AncienRegime. Ed. by ERIC MECHOULAN. (Paragraphes ).Montreal:Departement d'EtudesFranCaises, Universitede Montreal. 2000. 191 pp. $20. Revenge is omnipresent in French literature of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. From tragedy to novel, from memoir to short story; from duel to assassination, from restoring a reputation to defending one's honour, the theme occurs in countless incarnations across most types of writing. And yet important changes take place, over thisperiod, in literaryattitudestowardsrevenge. In order to head offthe cycle of revenge killing,justice becomes increasinglythe prerogative of civilized State, ratherthan furiousindividual. Even a Saint-Simon, memorably convinced that his aristocratichonour has been impugned by the elevation of royal bastards,has to seekredressbyjudicial means. These ten essaysseekto examine the changing face of revenge in the literaryworksof the period. We have studiesof the legal status of seventeenth-century...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it