MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379619778 · doi:10.1353/his.2023.a899619

Beyond the Asylum: Mental Illness in French Colonial Vietnam by Claire E. Edington (review)

2023· article· en· W4379619778 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. Michele Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVietnameseColonialismMental illnessHistoryPeriod (music)BlueprintGender studiesSociologyPsychologyArtVisual artsMental healthAestheticsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Beyond the Asylum: Mental Illness in French Colonial Vietnam by Claire E. Edington C. Michele Thompson Edington, Claire E.–Beyond the Asylum: Mental Illness in French Colonial Vietnam. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2019. 291 p. Claire E. Edington’s Beyond the Asylum: Mental Illness in French Colonial Vietnam truly does go “beyond the asylum” in its examination of the complex interplay between culture, both French and Vietnamese, medicine, and patterns of colonization and resistance to it in French Indochina, primarily Vietnam. This solidly researched and gracefully written volume is thought-provoking in many ways, and pertinent to the study of many topics in Vietnamese history from the late nineteenth century to about 1950, that it really should be read by anyone who studies or teaches about Vietnam during that period. Beyond the Asylum is based on Edington’s extensive archival research in Vietnam, France, and Cambodia and on a solid selection of secondary sources in English, French, and Vietnamese. She uses her numerous archivally sourced illustrations, which range from blueprints to reproductions of artwork from popular literature of the period, to maps and photographs, to draw attention to important points in the text in a way that a mere written description never could. For example, the very first figure, a 1934 photograph of the entrance to the Biên Hòa Asylum, [End Page 213] shows a road through a gate that is clearly decorative, rather than truly confining, and grounds with large trees and grassy lawns. The photograph illuminates and supports Edington’s statement that this asylum was based on a “more humanitarian conception of care than earlier methods of confinement—one that proved useful in improving the poor public image of the asylum” and that “the appearance of freedom itself was seen as curative” (p. 56). This, in turn, sets the scene for much of the discussion which follows on the everyday lives of patients and staff in Chapter 2 and even the author’s arguments regarding therapeutic labour in an increasingly exploitative colonial agricultural system in Chapter 3. Edington’s discussion of these subjects builds her case that while the French tried “to fashion the asylum as a world unto itself,” the paradigms in the outer world constantly impinged on French colonial asylums (p. 85). The author’s depiction of the history of the French colonial adoption of the labour-as-therapy pattern of treatment primarily from Dutch colonial mental health practices in the Dutch East Indies (today’s Indonesia) is especially interesting. It is rare for works on the history of colonial era medicine in Southeast Asia to go beyond the boundaries of any one colonial power or to discuss in any detail collaborative efforts between and among medical professionals from them. Clearly, there is more work to be done on the subject and Edington is leading the way. No work of scholarship is perfect and, despite its many strengths, this one is not either. It appears that most, if not all, of the small problems that I feel compelled to note appeared during the process of cutting this volume down in terms of length and, probably, in terms of notes. For example, on page 23 Edington discusses the Vietnamese concept of mental health and mental illness. She mentions both fourteenth-century documents and the physician Lȇ Hữu Trác in a sentence structure that suggests he himself lived in the fourteenth century when he lived in the eighteenth. There are also places (for example, page 25) where the source cited does not match the source from which the quote derives. On page 25, Edington is citing one of my own publications, but the wrong one. There are other small problems of this sort that are not worth going over in detail. Almost all of them concern the pre-modern period and Vietnamese Traditional Medicine and they do not materially affect Edington’s argument or the many great strengths of this book. One of those strengths is Edington’s commitment to discussing the effects of French colonization on ordinary everyday Vietnamese people and the resulting deterioration in what the French, and sometimes the Vietnamese, defined as mental health. This can be...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicHistory of Science and MedicineFrench-language works237,207