APLICAÇÃO DA LEI 12.996/2014: ASPECTOS CONTROVERTIDOS NO TRANSPORTE RODOVIÁRIO DE PASSAGEIROS NO BRASIL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo aborda o panorama legal e regulatório do setor de transporte rodoviário interestadual de passageiros no Brasil no ano de 2022, oito anos depois de o legislador abolir as regras que exigiam a licitação para a prestação dos serviços e estabelecer a autorização como novo modelo de outorga, apresentando as controvérsias suscitadas aos tribunais e o seu impacto para a implementação do novo marco regulatório. Para esse fim, o trabalho apresenta, de um lado, o resultado de uma pesquisa que buscou identificar as ações judiciais propostas com o objetivo de questionar a outorga de autorizações nos moldes da Lei no 12.996/2014 e o posicionamento dos tribunais e, de outro lado, uma crítica aos desafios impostos pelos atores institucionais, em especial Judiciário, Congresso e Tribunal de Contas da União, em razão da imposição de barreiras à entrada mediante limitações jurídicas e regulatórias ao ingresso de novos prestadores de serviço e à implantação da livre concorrência no setor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".