MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379622425 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2004.a827749

With a Pen in Her Hand: Women and Writing in Italy in the Nineteenth Century and beyond by Verina R. Jones , Anna Laura Lepschy (review)

2004· article· en· W4379622425 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Judith Bryce

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcquiescenceHegemonyAristocracy (class)MoralityGender studiesValue (mathematics)ImprovisationPower (physics)SociologySolidarityPolitenessPsychologyLawPolitical scienceArtPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MLR, 99.1, 2004 217 precludes all attitudes other than the author's from rearing their heads during improvisation .) Missing is a discussion of the historical pressures then acting on Goldoni, whose innovations enlarging the roles ofwomen and the underclasses, acknowledging their value, and challenging the false notion of a virtuous aristocracy had brought a hostile reaction from critics, audiences, and the authorities. Their calls for a more conventional morality met largely with his acquiescence, yet he persisted where he could in setting forthmore innovative views. As Franca Angelini notes in her Vita di Goldoni (Rome and Bari: Laterza, 1993), pp. 108-09 (not included in Giinsberg's bib? liography), the moralizing prefaces of the comedies of these years contrast markedly with the values embodied in the characters, most evidently in the case oiLa locandiera (1750), whose preface's punitive attitude towards independent women is belied by the play and its 'ammirazione evidente per Mirandolina'. Chapters V and VI provide a description of patriarchal hegemony that is a tour de force. Giinsberg has a fine understanding of the role of co-operation and competition in the male dynamic, and of male tendencies to foster female competition to prevent the formation among women of the kind of gender solidarity that permits men to dominate. She also elucidates female acquiescence. The opportunity for a more comprehensive theoretical paradigm would have been afforded by the inclusion in her discussion of Barbara Smuts's analysis of male aggression against women and of Goldoni's further innovations in developing roles for irregular men of the higher classes excluded from privileges by youth, paternal disfavour, or disordered behaviour. Given Giinsberg's emphasis on resisting patriarchal hegemony, her limited discus? sion of La locandiera (pp. 123-24, almost an aside and focusing on the Cavaliere rather than integrating considerations of Mirandolina's employee-husband) and Barufe ciozote (1762) is surprising and disappointing, given the feasible and realistic means of diminishing male dominance that they describe. It is, however, a predictable re? sult of the book's conservative approach and the truncated understanding of realism. Goldoni's solution shares a number of elements with those described by Smuts as muting male violence towards women. Mirandolina enjoys the most favourable form of it as sole heir to a piece of family property that ensures a stable income permitting her to attract and reject the upper-class male, and to hire a man whom she then marries and can control through her economic power while she (as is hinted) takes advantage ofthe opportunities offered by a transient clientele, furtherprotected by a state particularly ready to safeguard its citizens fromforeigners and disorder. Goldoni is too wise about the human social dynamic to refrain from including in these plays allusions to the disadvantages of blocking the male co-operation necessary to amassing abundant wealth and power: a permanently modest social status and income. Newcomb College, Tulane University Linda L. Carroll With a Pen in her Hand: Women and Writing in Italy in the Nineteenth Century and Beyond. Edited by Verina R. Jones and Anna Laura Lepschy. (Society for ltalian Studies, Occasional Papers, 5) Leeds: Society for ltalian Studies. 2000. x +120 pp. ?14. ISBN 0-9525901-5-8. With a Pen in her Hand contains the papers delivered in February 1997 at a two-day conference organized jointly by the Centre for ltalian Women's Studies at the Uni? versity of Reading and the Centre for ltalian Studies at University College London. The impressive line-up of speakers from the UK, Italy, France, and Canada and, not least, the welcome participationof two major ltalian creative writers and critics, Giuliana Morandini and Francesca Sanvitale, signal the ambitious nature of that event as 218 Reviews does the range of genres covered?from the novel, travel writing, conduct books, and social enquiry to journalism, lyric poetry, and theatre. As in 1997, the contribution by Morandini is in firstposition, an appropriate choice given her anthology La voce che e in lei (Milan: Bompiani, 1980), a seminal ltalian work on the subject of women's writing in this same period. Indeed, her pioneering role is acknowledged in several papers in the volume. In tribute to the Reading...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207