MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379622765 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2005.a826588

The Reinvention of Ignazio Silone by Elizabeth Leake (review)

2005· article· en· W4379622765 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deborah Holmes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhetoricElement (criminal law)IdealizationContext (archaeology)ManifestoPoliticsLiberalismPhilosophyIdeal (ethics)FaithSociologyPolitical scienceEpistemologyReligious studiesHistoryLawTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

526 Reviews This means once again that the non-specialist is given only a very general notion of concepts vital to Croce's anti-Fascism, such as 'the ideals ofthe Risorgimento', 'love of the fatherland', 'the Italian people'. Although Rizi criticizes Denis Mack Smith for denigrating Croce's 'false idealization of the Risorgimento' (p. 8), he does not offeran alternative analysis until more than two-thirds ofthe way through, in a brief summary of Croce's History of Europe. Conversely, one of the study's strengths is in illustrating how Croce's political career can provide a context for understanding his seemingly contradictory historical definitions of Fascism. For example, Rizi presents the 'parenthesis' theory primarily as a strategic tool used in dealing with the Allies, and the Antifascist Manifesto as the dying throes of non-interventionist liberalism. As a whole, this biography is a useful reminder that even thinkers of Croce's calibre do not have the benefit of hindsight, and that many intellectuals originally believed Fascism might represent an important element of revitalized Italy after the First World War. Gentile's education reform,carried out with Croce's support, shows how the Fascist government adopted traditional liberal ideas as ahd when it suited them. None the less, Rizi suggests an element of naivety in Croce's initial willingness to believe Mussolini's assurances of good faith. It is interesting to note that Gentile's muddying of philosophical concepts with Fascist rhetoric from 1923 onwards irked Croce more than all the squadristi violence of 1920-22. It took not only the Matteotti murder, but also Mussolini's failure to keep his promises afterwards, forhim to realize that much of Fascism's success relied on violent coercion. Rizi supplies fascinating details on the various subterfuges Croce practised to ensure his books were published uncensored during the Fascist era, details which encapsulate the main features of his anti-Fascist arsenal: international public opinion, an extensive network of influential friends, and privileged financial status. The wealth of material on his active financial and moral support for freedom of speech for all political and cultural shades of opi? nion includes police archive material, the taccuini, and private correspondence with friends and editors. As of 1925 and the beginning of Croce's active anti-Fascism, Rizi observes that the taccuini, previously work-notes, became increasingly personal. However, although he insists on the importance of individual contacts and private actions under a would-be totalitarian regime, he maintains at times an almost overrespectful distance from his subject. For instance, the references to Croce's family life are schematic, merely enough to make it tantalizingly clear that his wife and daughters played an important role in his anti-Fascist activities without giving details. Finally, the biography provides a poignant illustration of how the generation gap influenced European politics before and after the firstWorld War. Croce matured from 1866 to 1916 in an atmosphere of relative peace and progressiveness that nurtured his emotional attachment to the monarchy and to a strong, centralized state. Rizi uses this to explain why he voted confidence in Mussolini's government afterthe Matteotti affair,and to preserve the monarchy in 1946, despite the second intellectual youth that his opposition to Fascism had given him. New College, Oxford Deborah Holmes The Reinvention of Ignazio Silone. By Elizabeth Leake. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2003. viii + 200 pp. ?32. ISBN 0-8020-8767-1. This study of Ignazio Silone's earliest fictional works, Viaggio a Parigi, Fontamara, and Pane e vino, is the firstto adopt wholeheartedly the view that Silone informed on his Communist comrades forthe Fascists throughout the 1920s. Leake's psychoana? lytical reading aims to show how Silone 'reinvented' his supposedly duplicitous past; she presents his writing primarily as a cover-up operation that allowed him both to MLR, 100.2, 2005 527 disguise and to confess his betrayal. Sandwiching her literary analysis between in? troductory and concluding chapters on the informer debate, Leake does not advance any new evidence on the nature or motivation of Silone's contacts with Fascism and no attempt is made to explore the contested earlier phase of his 'Fascist' activities. As Leake herself stresses, she is a...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicItalian Fascism and Post-war SocietyFrench-language works237,207