MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379623353 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2004.a826939

In the Shadow of the Mammoth: Italo Svevo and the Emergence of Modernism by Giuliana Minghelli (review)

2004· article· en· W4379623353 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth Schächter

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMammothShadow (psychology)WrightHistoryWitnessModernism (music)Art historyArtLiteraturePhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1072 Reviews In the Shadow of the Mammoth: Italo Svevo and the Emergence of Modernism. By Giuliana Minghelli. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: University of Toronto Press. 2002. xi + 238 pp. ?32. ISBN 0-8020-3638-4. I firstcame across Minghelli's work, when working on Svevo, in the shape of her article 'In the Shadow ofthe Mammoth: Narratives of Symbiosis in La coscienza di Zeno', MLN, 109 (1994), 49-72, which in the present volume forms part of the last chapter. In the intervening years, Minghelli's thesis on this large extinct animal has itself grown to mammoth proportions. This book reads like a symphonic poem, the overture articulating the grand theme that is developed with variations and leitmotifs in the ensuing movements. We begin with an adventure story set in prehistoric times, La Guerre dufeu (1909), by a popular Franco-Belgian writer,J.H. Rosny aine, about a pact between the mammoth and man in which the more fragile creature is allowed to survive. Svevo was inspired to write his own version, 'L'uomo e la teoria darwiniana', where man, a 'uomo di abbozzo' (a man who is but a sketch), offershimself as a slave to the gentle, gigantic mammoth, and in exchange for protection, he lives in its shadow (p. 4, Minghelli's emphasis), developing weapons and tools in order to live eventually an independent existence. The bond, the symbiosis, that exists between the two, man and mammoth, is one of 'mutual contamination [. . .] between strength and weakness' (ibid.). This is the overarching premiss from which everything else follows. Thus Tri? este, a city 'in abbozzo' with its myriad ethnic contaminations, exists in the shadow of Austria-Hungary. It is in the shadow of Florence and the ideal ofthe Tuscan language that Italo Svevo and his contemporaries wrote. Svevo emerged from the shadow of the nineteenth-century Realist and Naturalist traditions, and fromwithin this shadow he 'forever changed the physiognomy of the Italian literary tradition', opening it out to 'modernist experimentation and contamination' (p. 13). Minghelli elaborates her analysis of Svevo's two fables 'L'uomo e la teoria dar? winiana' and 'La corruzione dell'anima', which, she argues, are central to a complete understanding of Svevo's ceuvre. On the problematic dating of the firstfable, Brian Moloney, in his review of this book in Italian Studies, 59 (2004), 166-68, contends that it is in fact three separate fragments, the second of which may be a discarded paragraph from La coscienza di Zeno. Minghelli then turns her attention to Giacomo Debenedetti's critique of Svevo's ceuvre, which was the firstserious and sustained appraisal to be published in Italy (1929). His thesis is that Svevo's limitations as a novelist are due to the fact that 'he left his Jewish origins in the shadows' (p. 51). This leads on to the Weininger connection and a rereading of the passages in La coscienza di Zeno where Weininger is mentioned by Guido in his tirade against women. Minghelli suggests that farfrom espousing these ideas, Zeno wishes to see them refuted: 'In Svevo's hands, Weininger becomes his vehicle to represent ironically, and thus distance, the misogyny permeating a whole society' (p. 69). In the remaining chapters (3-6), devoted primarily to Svevo's three novels, Min? ghelli posits the relationships between the male protagonists and women in terms of symbiosis and contamination; in short, they are a reworking of that between the 'uomo di abbozzo' and the mammoth. For example:' If [Alfonso's] mother can provide a faithful,silent shadow in which Alfonso can pursue his dreams?like the primitive man his evolution in the shadow ofthe mammoth?Annetta's shadow is a disquieting one' (p. 80); Amalia, Emilio's sister in Senilitd, lives in the shadow of her brother's adventure with Angiolina; the deceptions and disguises of the latter highlight the contaminations that are intrinsic in her affairwith Emilio; Augusta, Zeno's wife, is 'like the pacific mammoth [who] lives unconscious of herself and her surroundings' (p. 178); Carla, Zeno's lover, 'lives in the shadow of her small and modest apartment MLRy 99.4, 2004 1073 [. . .] and in the long shadow cast by Augusta's presence' (p...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207