Federico Fellini: Contemporary Perspectives by Frank Burke , Marguerite R. Waller (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MLR, 98.4, 2003 1011 Federico Fellini: Contemporary Perspectives. Ed. by Frank Burke and Marguerite R. Waller. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2002. xxxii + 239 pp. ?42 (pbk ?15). ISBN 0-8020-0696-5 (pbk 0-8020-7647-5). Fellini's influence upon contemporary film directors remains considerable, despite an uneven cinematic output. He was arguably at his best while he drew on his early experiences of provincial and urban life, and incorporated the acerbic, observational humour of co-writers Tullio Pinelli and Ennio Flaiano into his screenplays. By con? trast, the second half of Fellini's career is characterized by a whimsical excess caused by his estrangement from Pinelli and Flaiano, and also by his rather stagnant, cosseted existence as an established director. This paucity of fresh life experiences prompted him to cannibalize existing literary works or recycle his own dreams and fantasies, some of which were decades old, into film projects. Consequently, most overviews of Fellini's filmography reveal that for every Dolce vita there is usually a Casanova lurking offscreen. Whether this collection of essays, together with Marguerite Waller's thoughtful introduction, will have 'a significant impact on filmstudies', as its introductory pages proclaim, is questionable. Similarly, the assertion that the volume employs 'a range of recent critical approaches' (p. i) is also debatable, given that the semiotic, psychoanalytical , feminist, and deconstructionist perspectives adopted by most of the contributors are past the firstflush of youth and approaching middle age. Although there is a whiff of the seventies about this anthology, Waller justifiably highlights the lack of critical material on Fellini written during this theoretically productive decade, and in a sense the application of these perspectives to Fellini's work within this volume fillsa discernible gap within scholarly writing on Italian film. Using a semiotic approach, Frank Burke focuses primarily on the final, postmod? ern phase of Fellini's career, when his work consistently transformed the real and the representable into pure sign. Burke convincingly argues that certain effects in Casanova, such as the (in)famous 'garbage bag sea', exemplify the director's attempts to erase referentsaltogether, but is generous in his interpretation ofthe self-indulgent Intervista as 'codified' and 'parodic' in the way it constructs meaning through recycling Fellini's past films and experiences, and by exhibiting his film-making routine. Christopher Sharratt highlights Toby Dammit as a pivotal moment in Fellini's ceuvre, a film which marked a transition towards 'artificial cinema' and artifice, and which, together with the self-consciousness of later films, formed a basis for the director's critique of the 'formulaic, mind-deadening, mass production of art, the culture industry 's resuscitation and reformulation of bankrupt styles and conventions in its constant search for new forms and satisfactions' (p. 123). On a related theme, Millicent Marcus contributes a valuable discussion of Fellini's portrayal of television in Ginger e Fred, the medium constituting another source of signs that endlessly reflect other signs without any trace of a referent. Marcus also argues that beyond its surface attack on the brutalizing effectof commercial television upon the world of cinema, the film also contains an implicit indictment of cinema itself as a medium of simulation and self-referentiality. Through an analysis of Fellini's scepticism towards intellectuals, and towards lan? guage as a communication tool, William Van Watson's Lacan-influenced essay posi? tions Fellini's work in the realm ofthe visual imaginary rather than within the verbal symbolic, and interprets the director's keenness on studio filming as an example of a desire to reincorporate reality into the Imaginary Order, within a 'studio-womb'. Yet, as sometimes occurs with psychoanalytically oriented work, biographical detail?not in the formofunreliable quotations from Fellini himself, which several contributors to this volume use unquestioningly, but in terms of corroborated accounts from friends and family?can prove equally illuminating. It is well documented that Fellini's 1012 Reviews provincial upbringing made for an ambivalent attitude towards Rome's intellectuals; similarly,aftera frustratingspell of location filmingon a beach forLo sceicco bianco, he subsequently preferred to reinvent reality on his own terms in the studios of Cinecitta. Virginia Picchietti's study of Lo sceicco bianco explores the paradox that emerges when...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".