MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379659780 · doi:10.1109/ticps.2023.3283229

Robust and Resilient Distributed MPC for Cyber-Physical Systems Against DoS Attacks

2023· article· en· W4379659780 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Denial-of-service attackComputer scienceDistributed computingModel predictive controlConstraint (computer-aided design)Multi-agent systemCyber-physical systemControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, considering the ubiquitously existing cyber attacks in cyber-physical systems (CPSs), we present a robust and resilient distributed model predictive control (MPC) strategy for CPSs with multi-agent architecture under denial-of-service (DoS) attacks to achieve the goal of cooperative regulation with all agents' states being regulated to their equilibrium. Each agent in the CPSs is subject to external disturbances, and the communication channels among agents might be affected by randomly occurring DoS attacks. To tackle these issues, firstly, a novel robustness constraint is designed to handle the uncertainties in the MPC algorithm. By adding this constraint, the state of the nominal system can be confined in a shrinking and tighter range compared to the classical MPC approach, thus resulting in enhanced robustness against uncertainties. Furthermore, a lengthened sequence transmission strategy is proposed to mitigate the effect of the lack of information in the communication channels induced by DoS attacks. At each time instant, the controller of each agent utilizes the predicted state information to compensate for the transmission block-out from one agent to another. Moreover, recursive feasibility for the control framework and the closed-loop stability for the overall system are guaranteed by theoretical analysis. Finally, simulation and comparison studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed robust and resilient distributed MPC strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it