MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379740382 · doi:10.1109/iotm.001.2200185

Large-Scale Environmental Sensing of Remote Areas on a Budget

2023· article· en· W4379740382 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Magazine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityCloud computingModular designComputer scienceDefault gatewayInternet of ThingsArchitectureComputer networkNode (physics)The InternetMesh networkingWireless sensor networkSatelliteTelecommunicationsRemote sensingEmbedded systemEngineeringGeographyWirelessDatabaseWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By enabling large-scale in-situ environmental monitoring of remote areas, the Internet-of-Things (IoT) can play a crucial role in quantifying and responding to climate change. Sensing of uninhabited and many rural regions creates a need for inexpensive battery-powered IoT systems that can be deployed across large areas. Today, such systems are woefully unavailable. This article presents a scalable IoT architecture for low-cost and low-power in-situ environmental sensing. The architecture is anchored by self-organizing LoRa mesh networks that can be scaled to a hundred nodes, covering a hundred or more square kilometers, at a cost of less than US$15 per node. A low-power design enables nodes to operate for years on two AA batteries in many sensing applications. LoRa mesh networks connect to a cloud-based IoT backend via a battery-powered modular gateway, which supports Internet access over a WiFi network, a cellular network, and a low-earth orbit satellite system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it