MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379744957 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2002.a827879

The Art of Compromise: The Life and Work of Leonid Leonov by Boris Thomson , Leonid Leonov (review)

2002· article· en· W4379744957 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Peace

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvocationCompromiseArtReading (process)LiteratureArt historyHistoryPhilosophySociologyLinguisticsSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MLR, 97.4, 2002 1049 papers is something of a mixed bag, not helped by some uncompleted editing, in which the sluggish indeed threatens to dominate; happily, though, it is not without its more vibrant ingredients. Julian Connolly surveys the treatment of the supernatural in the early stories, finding The Return of Chorb a model for its evocation 'that will emerge as the standard in Nabokov's mature work' (p. 31). There are welcome critical outings for such stories as Music (read by Nassim W. Balestrini against Tolstoi's The Kreutzer Sonata), The Assistant Producer (discussed by Christian Moraru), and A Forgotten Poet (Brian Walter). Linda Wagner-Martin presents an effective feminist reading, from the 1990s, of The Vane Sisters. Victor Strandberg, discussing 'That in Aleppo Once . . .', ventures the possible paradox that, rather than having to know all of Nabokov's work to know any of itwell (as T. S. Eliot had remarked of Shakespeare), 'knowing any of it well may go a long way toward all of it' (p. 189). In the case of his chosen story,at least, Strandberg may be on rather safer ground than some of the other contributors could have been, had they proffered any such suggestion. By far the strongest contribution, however, is the valuable 46-page essay by J. E. Rivers, convincingly reclaiming the original French-language version of Mademoiselle O, in which, he proposes, 'The "O" could [ultimately] stand forthe paradox, the circularity' of the relationship between 'fact' and fiction (p. 118). This piece alone would have made this volume at the least a worthwhile library acquisition. Much the same might have been said for Maxim Shrayer's almost equally lengthy examination of the 'Vasiliy Shishkov' phenomenon (Nabokovian?or Sirinian?poems, story, hoax), but for the fact of its prior appearance in Shrayer's The World of Nabokov's Stories (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1999; reviewed MLR, 96 (2001), 1170-1), one of the three previous books devoted to Nabokov's short prose acknowledged in the editors' Foreword (p. 1). The editors of this volume can be wholeheartedly supported in one contention at least: that Nabokov's short fiction deserves (yet) more attention. University of Bristol Neil Cornwell The Art of Compromise: The Life and Work of Leonid Leonov. By Boris Thomson. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: University of Toronto Press. 2001. xiii + 40opp. ?55. Leonid Leonov is the grand old man of Soviet literature. He died in 1994 at the age of 95, productive to the end; yet his reputation has been partially eclipsed, both at home and in the West, by more fashionable younger writers and the literature of open dissent. Nevertheless, as Boris Thomson points out: 'Leonov, at least in his better works, can be seen as one of those for whom taboos and dangers have served as creative stimuli' (p. 104). Leonov was initially protected by Gorkii, who recommended him to Stalin. It is said that Stalin went through the novel The Thief with a red pencil, and later advised the author to transfer the footnotes of The Road to Ocean to the main text. He was not pleased when Leonov declined. Leonov himself claimed that six warrants forhis arrest had been issued at various times, which Stalin refused to sign. As president of the Union of Soviet Writers (1929), Pravda correspondent at the Nuremberg trials, recipient of Stalin and Lenin prizes, and author ofhack journalism, including eulogies of Stalin, he could be seen as part of the Soviet literary establishment, but given the circumstances of Stalinist Russia, one can be too hasty to judge. In 1968 he refused to sign a letter in support of the invasion of Czechoslovakia, and although honoured on his ninetieth birthday by a personal visit from Gorbachev, he did not feel flattered. Leonov had a guilty secret: during the British 1918-20 intervention in Archangel, he had been forced to become an officercadet in the White Army, but had later been 1050 Reviews protected by a young woman commissar. These facts he concealed to the last, only telling his daughters two or three years before his death. Thomson sees the 'guilty secret' as conditioning Leonov's art: 'he is trying not to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicEastern European Communism and ReformsFrench-language works237,207