MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379745090 · doi:10.1111/bpa.13174

A 3‐year‐old male with an extramedullary, intra‐ and extradural mass at T11‐L1

2023· article· en· W4379745090 on OpenAlexaff
Aziz Sagga, Vivek Mehta, Cynthia Hawkins, Frank K.H. van Landeghem

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Pathology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistiocytic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenStollery Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologySynaptophysinChromogranin AGiant cellCD34LesionCD68CD117MedicineAnatomyEosinophilicBiologyImmunohistochemistryStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 3-year-old boy presented to the Emergency Department with acute urinary incontinence and a 2-month history of progressive nighttime low back pain, gait disturbance, and constipation. MRI demonstrated a 3 × 1.8 × 1.2 cm, extramedullary, extra- and intradural midline mass extending from T11 to L1 level (Figure 1). The mass was isointense on both, T1- and T2-weighted images and showed moderate, focally heterogenous contrast enhancement. Postoperative course following neurosurgical total resection was uneventful. Histological examination showed a lesion with numerous foamy cells and intermingled cells with spindled morphology (Figure 2; Box 1). The lesion appeared monomorphous with focal accumulations of a few multinucleated Touton giant cells and focal infiltrates of lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils (Figure 2A). Neither pigment, nor a dense reticulin network or necrosis was present. No mitotic activity was noted. The cells were positive for CD68 (KP1; Figure 2B) and factor XIIIa (Figure 2C) but negative for CD1a, lysozyme, CD34, HMB45, Melan A/Mart1, GFAP, synaptophysin and chromogranin A. Approximately 5% of the lesion showed nuclear immunopositivity for S100. Proliferative index was varying, being as high as 5% (MIB-1/Ki67; Figure 2D). Ultrastructural analysis showed the lipidized cytoplasm of the cells as well as some cells with notched nuclei and some cholesterol clefts. No inclusion bodies such as cytoplasmic tennis racket-like bodies were identified. Molecular analysis revealed no BRAF V600E or other mutation, and no gene fusion was detected using the TruSight RNA Pan-Cancer seq panel (Illumina, USA). Access at https://isn-slidearchive.org/?col=ISN&fol=Archive&file=BPA-22-11-273.svs Juvenile xanthogranuloma. The neuroradiological differential diagnosis of our case included meningioma, ependymoma, lymphoma, and neuroblastoma. Frozen and permanent sections showed a histiocytic tumor with presence of multinucleated Touton giant cells, immunopositivity for CD68 and Factor XIIIa as well as lack of CD1a expression, lack of Birbeck granules, and lack of a BRAF V600E mutation. This pattern of pathological findings supports the diagnosis of juvenile xanthogranuloma (JXG) and excludes other histiocytosis, including Langerhans cell histiocytosis and Erdheim-Chester disease, which typically occur in older adults. JXG is the most common non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis, affects predominantly infants and young children and typically presents as solitary skin lesion [1]. In less than 5% of patients, systemic dissemination is noted, showing a mortality of 5%–10%. Isolated extracutaneous manifestations such as eye, brain, skeletal muscle, and peripheral nerve are much less common. Isolated spinal JXG is rare and may involve vertebral bodies or have an intradural/extramedullary or intra/extradural location. JXG may involve nerve roots or cauda equina. Intramedullary JXG is extremely rare. Thirteen pediatric patients with spinal JXG are reported, including the current patient, with an average age of 6.1 years and an age range of 6 months–15 years. No sex predilection is noted. Six of the spinal JXG were in an extramedullary, intradural localization, six in vertebral bodies, and one in the cauda equina. These findings in pediatric patients are not different from those in 13 reported adult patients with spinal JXG: no definite predilection of sex or location of the lesion is observed [2]. The average age of the adult group is 30.3 years with an age range of 18–67 years. Spinal JXG appears isointense to hyperintense on T1- and hyperintense T2-weighted images on MRI with homogenous or focally heterogenous contrast enhancement. JXG has been shown to harbor mutations in BRAF (p.V600E), ARAF, MAP2K1, CSF-1R, CSF-3R, KIT, ALK, MET, JAK3, and RAF1, KRAS, and NRAS as well as fusions involving BRAF, NTRK1, ALK, and RET [1, 3]. None of these molecular alterations have been detected in the current case or in any of the published cases of isolated spinal JXG that were molecularly studied for BRAF alterations (two cases were studied out of 26 in total). Complete surgical resection is the therapy of choice but dependent on the location and aggressiveness of the JXG, additional chemotherapy may be required. Complete surgical resection only was performed in 12 of the 13 solitary pediatric spinal JXG; the patients are either disease-free or stable (observation period 3 months–4.5 years). One patient received subtotal resection and neoadjuvant denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits ligand binding to receptor activator of NF-kappa B (RANK); this patient is stable (observation period 3 years). Our patient was being followed up in outpatient clinic: at his last visit, he was demonstrating marked improvement with his ability to walk, and normal urinary function. His latest follow-up MRI did not show any residual or recurrent tumor after 3.5 years. Aziz Sagga analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Vivek Mehta provided essential clinical data and reviewed the manuscript. Cynthia Hawkins provided essential material and data and reviewed the manuscript. Frank van Landeghem analyzed the data, co-wrote and reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain PathologySame topicHistiocytic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207