MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379767006 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.042007

Optically targeted search for gravitational waves emitted by core-collapse supernovae during the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo

2024· article· en· W4379767006 on OpenAlexaff
M. J. Szczepańczyk, Y. Zheng, Javier M. Antelis, M. G. Benjamin, M. A. Bizouard, Alejandro Casallas-Lagos, P. Cerdá–Durán, D. Davis, D. Rosińska, S. Klimenko, Claudia E. Moreno, M. Obergaulinger, J. Powell, D. S. Ramirez, B. Ratto, Colter Richardson, Abhinav Rijal, A. L. Stuver, P. Szewczyk, G. Vedovato, M. Zanolin, I. Bartos, S. Bhaumik, T. Bulik, M. Drago, José A. Font, Fabio De Colle, J. García-Bellido, V. Gayathri, Brennan Hughey, G. Mitselmakher, T. Mishra, Soma Mukherjee, Quynh Lan Nguyen, M. Chan, I. Di Palma, B. J. Piotrzkowski, N. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNarodowa Agencja Wymiany AkademickiejEuropean CommissionNarodowe Centrum NaukiAustralian Research CouncilMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLIGOPhysicsSupernovaGravitational waveNeutron starAstrophysicsAstronomyLuminosityBlack hole (networking)Galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the results from a search for gravitational-wave transients associated with core-collapse supernovae observed optically within 30 Mpc during the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. No gravitational wave associated with a core-collapse supernova has been identified. We then report the detection efficiency for a variety of possible gravitational-wave emissions. For neutrino-driven explosions, the distance at which we reach 50% detection efficiency is up to 8.9 kpc, while more energetic magnetorotationally driven explosions are detectable at larger distances. The distance reaches for selected models of the black hole formation, and quantum chromodynamics phase transition are also provided. We then constrain the core-collapse supernova engine across a wide frequency range from 50 Hz to 2 kHz. The upper limits on gravitational-wave energy and luminosity emission are at low frequencies down to ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}{c}^{2}$ and $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}{c}^{2}/\mathrm{s}$, respectively. The upper limits on the proto-neutron star ellipticity are down to 3 at high frequencies. Finally, by combining the results obtained with the data from the first and second observing runs of LIGO and Virgo, we improve the constraints of the parameter spaces of the extreme emission models. Specifically, the proto-neutron star ellipticities for the long-lasting bar mode model are down to 1 for long emission (1 s) at high frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.414 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207