MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379780119 · doi:10.1353/nor.2020.a799319

Camp Little Norway Club, Chicago

2020· article· en· W4379780119 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deborah Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueNorwegian-American Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture, Design, and Social History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorwegianClubHistoryWorld War IIParadeMillerGerontologyPolitical scienceMedicineLawArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

viii p h o t o g r a p h f e a t u r e Camp Little Norway Club, Chicago Deborah Miller During World War II, many in Chicago’s Norwegian community threw themselves into supporting the Norwegian war effort. To aid the Toronto-­ based Camp Little Norway, where Norwegian airmen trained for Norway’s air force, forty-­ eight men organized the Camp Little Norway Club of Chicago (CLNCC) on November 3, 1941. Its aim was to collect gifts and funds for Norway’s armed forces. Most of the members were what the secretary described as “Little Fellows—­ tradesmen and professional men and their families,” so the dues were set at $1 a year. The work of the Camp Little Norway Club of Chicago was divided between men’s and women’s efforts. The men organized fund drives and charity events, using meeting space at the Chicago Norske Klub at no charge. They sold stamps from the American Friends of Norway with pictures of a very young Prince Harald to help supply the Free Norwegian Fighting Forces with medical supplies. During 1 Figure 1. American and Norwegian flags followed the banner of the Camp Little Norway Club of Chicago as men, women, and children, some in Norwegian costumes, marched in Chicago’s Seventeenth of May parade, ca. 1941­ –­ 1944. From the Hermana Rye Haugan papers, 1906–­ 1993 (P908). Courtesy of the Norwegian-­ American Historical Association, Northfield, Minnesota. 2 photograph feature the five-­ year life of the club, they raised some $45,000 in cash to donate to the Norwegian cause. The women helped supply the demand for knitting, especially wool socks, for the Norwegian armed forces. Some of the money raised by the men went to buy yarn for the women to use. Groups of women, including Daughters of Norway lodges, Ladies Aids, and the eleven women who informally organized Mina’s Knitting Club, met in each others’ homes to knit. At one point the knitters asked their leader, Hermana Rye Haugan, to inquire whether other woolen goods were needed along with socks, but the response from Olav Sørensen, welfare officer of the Royal Norwegian Air Force in Toronto, was clear: “Our continual need is socks.” The CLNCC report in 1946, which summarized its history and accomplishments after it closed down, noted that Chicago women had knitted and sent the following items to Camp Little Norway: 205 sweaters, 1,477 pairs of socks, 67 pairs of wristlets, 160 scarves, and 75 chest warmers. The preferred stockings were Badger Socks No. 1019. The women also hosted fundraising events such as a talk by Sigrid Undset. Figure 2. A cardboard membership card of the Camp Little Norway Club of Chicago includes the names of the club’s president, financial secretary, and corresponding secretary in 1944, along with the name and address of the member. From the Hermana Rye Haugan papers, 1906–­ 1993 (P908). Courtesy of the Norwegian-­ American Historical Association, Northfield, Minnesota. 3 camp little norway club, chicago After the war ended in 1945, Norwegian-­ American groups continued to organize aid to Norwegians in Norway, who were in great need of clothing, food, and other necessities. The CLNCC sustained its efforts into 1946. A larger Chicago women’s group called Kle Norge Bua (Clothe Norway Shop) collected fifty thousand pounds of mostly used clothing to send to Norway, each piece of which had Figure 3. The American Friends of Norway pictured curly-­ haired Prince Harald, age 9, heir to the throne of Norway, on the victory stamps they sold to help purchase medical supplies for the Norwegian forces. From the Hermana Rye Haugan papers, 1906–­ 1993 (P908). Courtesy of the Norwegian-­ American Historical Association, Northfield, Minnesota. Figure 4. The pattern used by hundreds of Chicago’s Norwegian women to knit socks for the airmen at Camp Little Norway. From the Hermana Rye Haugan papers, 1906–­ 1993 (P908). Courtesy of the Norwegian-­ American Historical Association, Northfield, Minnesota. 4 photograph feature to be sorted, repaired, cleaned, packed, and shipped. The value placed on the donated clothing was $150,000. Records in the Norwegian-­ American Historical Association archives that document these efforts and more include the Hermana Rye Haugan papers, the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorwegian-American StudiesSame topicArchitecture, Design, and Social HistoryFrench-language works237,207