MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379781311 · doi:10.1353/bio.2022.a856082

Disability Daily Drawn: A Comics Collaboration

2022· article· en· W4379781311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joann Purcell, Simone Purcell Randmaa

Bibliographic record

VenueBiography · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Rights and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComicsSpectacleTragedy (event)PsychologyIntellectual disabilityDaughterSociologyHistoryArtLiteraturePsychiatryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disability Daily DrawnA Comics Collaboration Joann Purcell (bio) and Simone Purcell Randmaa (bio) My daughter Simone was the first person I met with Down syndrome. I was forty-two years old. This is an astonishing statement for many reasons, but primarily because I had worked as a nurse in downtown Toronto, Canada for fifteen years. When Simone was born, the delivery room went silent. The presumed tragedy of disability, medically avoidable, had permeated the room. Simone was not a child—she was a child with a disability. The chasm was wide. I remember being as devastated by her diagnosis as the rest of our family and friends, but we got on with our lives, largely because of our four-year-old twins. We loved Simone; we didn't love Down syndrome. She needed a lot of extra help to coordinate her muscles to crawl, walk, and eventually tie her shoelaces. She endured weekly visits from the physiotherapist, the early interventionist, and appointments with a myriad of specialists at the local children's hospital. It is undeniable that Simone is different, but I am also struck by how her way of being does not align with the stereotype I held previously. She is emotionally astute, a joyful child whose different way of knowing the world is creative, generative, and meaningful. There is a disconnect between our lived reality and the socially prevalent conceptions of Down syndrome. I began this comics project with the intention to amplify Simone's voice, to share her intellectual, affective, and communicative differences, and significantly, to share without speaking for her. Feminist scholar Linda Alcoff outlines the issues around speaking for others, in particular speaking for those who are or have been historically silent (6). The privilege of the speaking voice over another results in silences and erasure. Normative forms of communication dominate the sociocultural landscape, and thus the voice of a person with Down syndrome, who might be less vocally articulate, speak more slowly or with a focus that does not follow a logical conversation, may be dismissed. Artist, curator, and disability scholar Amanda Cachia writes, Developmentally disabled people are able to engage in modes of dialogical or socially engaged art practices in ways that express their way of knowing and understanding the world. These practices are particularly effective insofar as they emphasize the always-already inter-subjective and inter-corporeal nature of all embodiment. (122–23) [End Page 97] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 98] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 99] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 100] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 101] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 102] In choosing a platform, I landed on a comics practice for its dialogical structure and unique ability to showcase subjugated knowledge and to serve as visual witness to a life lived outside normative lines. I drew a four-panel comic every day beginning when Simone was ten years old, to the accumulation of 1095 pages. I distilled our exchanges and documented the mundanity of our life together. Over time, this daily practice became part of the fabric of our family's life. The element of time was integral to the project. The commitment to a daily entry over three years worked on many different levels. I found shorthand ways to draw, and my rusty drawing skills improved. Drawing, a skill I had let go of with the busyness of life, was now given the time, space, and purpose to develop again. Notably, this meant I regularly paid attention to the small details of our routine and repetitive life together. The need for content in the nightly transcription forced me to observe Simone more closely. I could see her, hear her, sense her in a new way. Our relationship grew. My perception of her vulnerability gave way to observations of her profound agency. The method for creating these comics was to employ sensory ethnography and mimesis. Sarah Pink writes about "doing ethnography that takes as its starting point the multi-sensoriality of experience, perception, knowing and practice" (1). This is a skill that requires time and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0020.017
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4440.209

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiographySame topicDisability Rights and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207