MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379781311 · doi:10.1353/bio.2022.a856082

Disability Daily Drawn: A Comics Collaboration

2022· article· en· W4379781311 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joann Purcell, Simone Purcell Randmaa

Notice bibliographique

RevueBiography · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDisability Rights and Representation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComicsSpectacleTragedy (event)PsychologyIntellectual disabilityDaughterSociologyHistoryArtLiteraturePsychiatryPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Disability Daily DrawnA Comics Collaboration Joann Purcell (bio) and Simone Purcell Randmaa (bio) My daughter Simone was the first person I met with Down syndrome. I was forty-two years old. This is an astonishing statement for many reasons, but primarily because I had worked as a nurse in downtown Toronto, Canada for fifteen years. When Simone was born, the delivery room went silent. The presumed tragedy of disability, medically avoidable, had permeated the room. Simone was not a child—she was a child with a disability. The chasm was wide. I remember being as devastated by her diagnosis as the rest of our family and friends, but we got on with our lives, largely because of our four-year-old twins. We loved Simone; we didn't love Down syndrome. She needed a lot of extra help to coordinate her muscles to crawl, walk, and eventually tie her shoelaces. She endured weekly visits from the physiotherapist, the early interventionist, and appointments with a myriad of specialists at the local children's hospital. It is undeniable that Simone is different, but I am also struck by how her way of being does not align with the stereotype I held previously. She is emotionally astute, a joyful child whose different way of knowing the world is creative, generative, and meaningful. There is a disconnect between our lived reality and the socially prevalent conceptions of Down syndrome. I began this comics project with the intention to amplify Simone's voice, to share her intellectual, affective, and communicative differences, and significantly, to share without speaking for her. Feminist scholar Linda Alcoff outlines the issues around speaking for others, in particular speaking for those who are or have been historically silent (6). The privilege of the speaking voice over another results in silences and erasure. Normative forms of communication dominate the sociocultural landscape, and thus the voice of a person with Down syndrome, who might be less vocally articulate, speak more slowly or with a focus that does not follow a logical conversation, may be dismissed. Artist, curator, and disability scholar Amanda Cachia writes, Developmentally disabled people are able to engage in modes of dialogical or socially engaged art practices in ways that express their way of knowing and understanding the world. These practices are particularly effective insofar as they emphasize the always-already inter-subjective and inter-corporeal nature of all embodiment. (122–23) [End Page 97] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 98] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 99] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 100] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 101] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 102] In choosing a platform, I landed on a comics practice for its dialogical structure and unique ability to showcase subjugated knowledge and to serve as visual witness to a life lived outside normative lines. I drew a four-panel comic every day beginning when Simone was ten years old, to the accumulation of 1095 pages. I distilled our exchanges and documented the mundanity of our life together. Over time, this daily practice became part of the fabric of our family's life. The element of time was integral to the project. The commitment to a daily entry over three years worked on many different levels. I found shorthand ways to draw, and my rusty drawing skills improved. Drawing, a skill I had let go of with the busyness of life, was now given the time, space, and purpose to develop again. Notably, this meant I regularly paid attention to the small details of our routine and repetitive life together. The need for content in the nightly transcription forced me to observe Simone more closely. I could see her, hear her, sense her in a new way. Our relationship grew. My perception of her vulnerability gave way to observations of her profound agency. The method for creating these comics was to employ sensory ethnography and mimesis. Sarah Pink writes about "doing ethnography that takes as its starting point the multi-sensoriality of experience, perception, knowing and practice" (1). This is a skill that requires time and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,444
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,793

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,002
Communication savante0,0100,005
Science ouverte0,0020,017
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4440,209

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,318
Écart entre enseignants0,301 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBiographyMême sujetDisability Rights and RepresentationTravaux en français237 207