MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4379791804 · doi:10.1353/cro.2008.a783166

Dualisms: The Agons of the Modern World (review)

2008· article· en· W4379791804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Harold Ellens

Bibliographic record

VenueCrossCurrents · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanismClassicsArt historyCONTESTPhilosophyArtTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DUALISMS: THE AGONS OF THE MODERN WORLD, Richard J. Quinones. Toronto and London: University Press, 2007. Pp. 451 + xvi. Cloth, npi. Reviewed by J. Harold Ellens. Ricardo J. Quinones is notable Professor of Comparative Literature Emeritus in Department of English, and Director of Gould Center for Humanistic Studies at Claremont's McKenna College. He has previously given us Renaissance Discovery of Time, Cambridge University Press, 1972; Dante Alighieri, Twayne, 1985; Mapping Literary Modernism, Princeton University Press, 1985; Modernism: Challenges and Perspectives, University of Illinois Press, 1986; The Changes of Cain: Violence and Lost Brother in Cain and Abel Literature, Princeton University Press, 1991; Foundation Sacrifice in Dante's Comedia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994; Dante Alighieri, Updated Edition, G. K. Hall, 1998; numerous professional journal articles; and substantial reviews. Now he offers us, perhaps, most profound of all his erudite publications, Dualisms: The Agons of Modern World. is a weighty volume about telling tensions in life and literature that describe creative contrasts and persistent polarities pervasively present in every aspect of existence. Agon means struggle, contest, playing to win a game, and Quinones declaims, as his jacket declares, Dualism is a motif that runs through literature of all genres and historical contexts, inspiring argumentation at highest level and showing formation of ideas in association as a creative exchange. arises with special pertinence in Western literature since Renaissance and Reformation. David M. Hertz of Indiana University observed that This is field of Comparative Literature as it should have been all along, and hopefully as it could be in future (cover). Quinones begins his book with a quote from Martin Luther's Th^ Righteousness of God, that warns us we are all either Esauites of Jacobites, and as one ideology triumphs, from its very heart will spring up contesting notions; thus always Cain or Abel, Esau or Jacob. That aptly sets theme and course for this remarkable valuable volume. has Preface, Introduction, five substantial chapters, and an Epilogue. The endpapers include a worthy index of 350 entries, a sturdy bibliography of 360 cited works, and 32 pages of endnotes. The University of Toronto has packaged this fine volume in a most attractive and professional style. is an absolutely lovely book to see, hold, fondle, smell, read, and cherish! How did we do without it for so long? Presenting a new typology with a distinctive paradigm of development, Dualisms considers four different encounters from four different centuries: Erasmus and Luther, Voltaire and Rousseau, Turgenev and Dostoevsky, and Sartre and Camus. These four dualisms are important for what they are and what they represent; they are historically specific, psychologically farreaching, and quite dramatic. They stand out as major intellectual contests that create modern era, agons of our time (Preface, ix). Quinones consciously inquires into the nature and function of dualism at highest level of encounter between pre-eminent figures, hoping by this means to initiate a new analysis of modern models for conceptualizing and interpreting life and literature (Preface, x). He starts with Erasmus and Luther because they open modern era and its context between radical Protestantism and humanistic philosophy. It is practically inevitable that clash between two such as Luther and Erasmus should have occurred, one requiring such totality of commitment in exercise of conscience, and other engaged in play of consciousness upon world's multiplicity - Matthew Arnold's 'Hebraism' and 'Hellenism' (Preface, xi). To Quinones' pleasant surprise, it seems, dualisms that follow and form content of this book all adhere to same patterns of tension, contrast, and mutuality as that of Erasmus and Luther. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrossCurrents→Same topicByzantine Studies and History→French-language works237,207→