Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Religion in Asia Today Pamela D. Winfield This issue of CrossCurrents is dedicated to the modern challenges facing Asia today and to the creative ways in which religions of the region are responding to natural, social and global stressors. It stems from a deliberate and intentional expansion in scope as CrossCurrents’ readership expands via its electronic format to a worldwide audience. It also deliberately strives to introduce lesser known traditions, figures, and movements into the mainstream Hindu, Buddhist, and Muslim discourses of Asia. It is our sincere wish that these essays, which touch upon the environmental, hyper‐urban, economic, gendered, educational, and political dimensions of religion in Asia and “transnational Asia” today, both instruct and inspire readers to shape informed and nuanced opinions that may ripple out to impact others. East Asia When the seed for this issue first germinated many months ago, no one could have anticipated that the 9.0 earthquake and tsunami in Sendai, Japan would present itself as perhaps the most pressing contemporary challenge to the country and to its religious groups today. Scholar of Japanese religions Levi McLaughlin (Wofford College, SC) outlines the events of March 11, 2011, and highlights the relief efforts, memorial ceremonies, and humanitarian motivations of the well‐established and especially more recently established religious groups in Japan. In his brief and timely piece, McLaughlin underscores the religious ethos at the heart of secular Japan as it begins to rebuild. Environmental scholar and activist Mark McGuire (John Abbott College, Montréal) also opens his essay with a religious response to the natural and nuclear devastation in Japan. Nestled deep in the UNESCO‐protected Kumano mountain range, Tateishi Kōshō leads a special Shugendō rite and eco‐pilgrimage to pray for lost souls and responsible government cleanup. Shugendō is Japan’s age‐old blend of mountain veneration, esoteric Buddhism, and asceticism that is designed to empower individual and collective well‐being. Tateishi is now updating and offering these nature practices anew to the hyper‐urbanized and increasingly disaffected (and often female) casualties of neo‐liberal competition and global economic forces. As McGuire reflects on his own role in bringing Tateishi’s movement to light as a scholar and film producer of the 2010 ethnographic documentary Shugendō Now, he engages with philosopher Ernest Bloch and cultural critic Henri Giroux’s theories of “hope” to analyze the transformative potential of eco‐pilgrimage for modern‐day seekers. The urban–rural divide and other effects of globalization are further taken up by anthropologist Laurel Kendall (American Museum of Natural History, NY). In an excerpt from her 2010 award‐winning Shamans, Nostalgias and the IMF: South Korean Popular Religion in Motion, Kendall demonstrates how contemporary female shamans (mansin) have adapted to shifting religious landscapes and to new global realities during and after the IMF Crisis of 1997–1998. Even as urban sprawl has pushed these women out of the cities to rent mountainside kuttang shrines for kut diagnostic and remedial rituals, so too have improved trade relations between mainland China and South Korea since the 1990s facilitated the mansins’ empowerment pilgrimages to Mt. Paektu from the Chinese side (the North Korean side is still impassible to southerners). The linkages between the global economy and the local religious practice have never been more clearly elucidated. The next two essays extend the theme of women’s power and agency in today’s Asian and transnational Asian religious scenes. Jennifer Eichman (Moravian College, PA) features four pioneering Buddhist nuns in contemporary Taiwan who have been inspired by so‐called humanistic or engaged Buddhism (renjian fojiao in Chinese). While the personalities and impact‐strategies differ radically among Chen Yeng the traditionalist, Chao Hwei the activist, Kuan Ch’ien the academic aesthete, and Ching Hai the New Age guru, they all have garnered international acclaim and support for their relief efforts, charitable works, public welfare institutions, structural justice initiatives, ecological activism, feminist leadership, food consciousness, and yes, even spiritual fashion‐forwardness. Their savvy use of the Internet and other global media is notable as they compete for successful spiritual product placement in today’s marketplace of ideas. South/Southeast Asia/Himalayas Amanda Huffer (University of California‐Riverside) looks at the transnational female...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".