MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379795519 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2023.060309

Applications and challenges of hybrid artificial intelligence in chip age testing: a comprehensive review

2023· review· en· W4379795519 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cong Xu, Wensheng Chen, Mingkuan Lin, Jianli Lu, Yunghsiao Chung, Jiahui Zou, Ciliang Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceAdaptation (eye)Artificial neural networkGenetic algorithmConvolutional neural networkMachine learningGeneralizationDeep learningStability (learning theory)Evolutionary algorithmReliability engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As technology rapidly advances, semiconductor devices play a crucial role in various fields. However, these devices experience aging over time, leading to performance degradation, failure, or system crashes. Real-time aging detection of semiconductor devices is essential. This paper presents a real-time aging detection technique for semiconductor devices, combining deep learning and evolutionary algorithms, effectively assessing and predicting device aging states using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN). These features are then input into evolutionary algorithm frameworks, such as Genetic Algorithms (GA) and Genetic Algorithms (PSO), to identify and predict aging trends. The adaptation of evolutionary algorithms ensures good generalization for various semiconductor devices. Through extensive experimental data analysis, the proposed technique demonstrates excellent accuracy and real-time performance compared to traditional aging detection methods. In addition, it also monitors their operation in real-time, providing valuable support for maintenance and management personnel. The findings contribute to improving semiconductor device reliability and stability, providing a robust foundation for intelligent and automated maintenance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.345
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.070 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence PracticeSame topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207