MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

IMPACT OF BODY POSITION ON ARTERIAL STIFFNESS OF ELASTIC AND MUSCULAR ARTERIES

2023· article· en· W4379796690 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Rico, Nadège Côté, Saliha Addour, Sanam Khataei, Laurent Legault, Amira Tairi, Émy Philibert, Catherine Fortier, Mohsen Agharazii

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupine positionMedicineArterial stiffnessPulse wave velocityBlood pressureBody positionCardiologyInternal medicineArterial wallPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Arterial stiffness is assessed through determination of pulse wave velocity (PWV) over an arterial segment of interest. Measurements are traditionally done in a supine position, which is both practical for high quality arterial pressure wave recordings, and the stability of pressure exerted on the arterial wall along the arterial path. The aim of this project was to study the effect of body position on the stiffness of elastic and muscular arteries. Design and method: This study was conducted with healthy adults. Aortic (cf-PWV) and brachial stiffness (CR-PWV) were repeatedly measured in three different positions (supine, 30̊ and 60̊) using the Complior Analyse. Brachial blood pressure (Mobil-O-graph) was also measured in each position. Generalized Estimating Equations in SPSS were performed to establish changes of PWV between positions. Results: In 23 healthy individuals (65% female, mean age of 36±15 years, and mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) of 120±2 mmHg and 76±2 mmHg, respectively), CF-PWV increased progressively with body tilting (8.7 (CI95% = 8.0–9.4) m/s supine, 9.4 (CI95% = 8.8–10.0) m/s at 30̊ and 9.5 (CI95% = 8.8–10.1) m/s at 60̊) (p<0.001)). On the other hand, CR-PWV didn’t significantly change with body tilting (8.7 (CI95% = 8.0–9.3) m/s supine, 8.8 (CI95% = 8.0–9.6) m/s at 30̊ and 8.9 (CI95% = 8.1–9.6) m/s at 60̊). SBP didn’t significantly change with body tilting (120 (CI95% = 116-125) mmHg supine, 121 (CI95% = 116–125) mmHg at 30̊ and 122 (CI95% = 117-126) mmHg at 60̊), while DBP increased (76 (CI95% = 71-80) mmHg supine, 78 (CI95% = 73–83) mmHg at 30̊ (p<0.022) and 81 (CI95% = 77-85) mmHg at 60̊ (p<0.001)). Heart rate also increased with body tilting (68 (CI95% = 64–72) BPM supine, 69 (CI95% = 65–73) BPM at 30̊ and 77 (CI95% = 72–82) BPM at 60̊ (p<0.001)). Conclusions: These preliminary results show that elastic and muscular arteries tend to react differently to body positions, without significant changes in arterial stiffness of medium muscular arteries in the arm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207