Strain-based forward modeling and inversion of seismic moment tensors using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) observations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study used a waveform inversion of distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) data, acquired in two horizontal monitoring wells, to estimate the moment tensor (MT) of two induced microearthquakes. An analytical forward model was developed to simulate far-field tangential strain generated by an MT source in a homogeneous and anisotropic medium, averaged over the gauge length along a fiber of arbitrary orientation. To prepare the data for inversion, secondary scattered waves were removed from the field observations, using f - k filtering and time-windowing. The modeled and observed primary arrivals were aligned using a cut-and-paste approach. The MT parameters were inverted via a least-squares approach, and their uncertainties were determined through bootstrap analysis. Using simulated data with additive noise derived from the field data and the same fiber configuration as the monitoring wells, the inversion method adequately resolved the MT. Despite the assumption of Gaussian noise, which underlies the least-squares inversion approach, the method was robust in the presence of heavy-tailed noise observed in field data. When the inversion was applied to field data, independent inversion results using P-waves, S-waves, and both waves together yielded results that were consistent between the two events and for different wave types. The agreement of the inversion results for two events resulting from the same stress field illustrated the reliability of the method. The uncertainties of the MT parameters were small enough to make the inversion method useful for geophysical interpretation. The variance reduction obtained from the data predicted for the most probable MT was satisfying, even though the polarity of the P-waves was not always correctly reproduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".