Du consentement libre et éclairé : de l’utopie au sens pratique à l’acte de foi « raisonnable »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au sens strict du terme, consentir de manière « libre et éclairée » implique 1) de pouvoir s’affranchir des déterminants au fondement des conduites humaines et 2) d’être en mesure de prévoir l’ensemble de conséquences possibles des décisions prises. Dans le cadre de cet article, le consentement au sens strict est compris comme une utopie. À partir de l’analyse d’observations issues de la psychologie clinique et de l’intervention psychosociale, de même que d’une revue critique de publications scientifiques, trois formes d’assentiment sont distinguées : l’acte de foi aveugle, l’obéissance volontaire et l’acte de foi « raisonnable ». Pour chacune de ces formes, des enjeux éthiques reliés à la clinique sont présentés et discutés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.064 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.056 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".