MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379803595 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2023.3281525

An Energy Efficient Coherent IR-UWB Receiver With Non-Coherent-Assisted Synchronization

2023· article· en· W4379803595 on OpenAlexafffund
Amin Pourvali Kakhki, Mohammad Taherzadeh‐Sani, Frédéric Nabki

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectronic engineeringRadio receiver designAmplifierComputer sciencePhase-shift keyingKeyingLocal oscillatorAmplitude-shift keyingIntegratorBasebandCMOSBit error rateTransmitterEngineeringTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Phase noiseBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a non-coherent assisted synchronization mechanism for low data rate coherent impulse radio ultra-wide band (IRUWB) receivers. A two-step coarse and fine acquisition mechanism is utilized to simplify the coherent synchronization and minimize the total required packet length. This hybrid scheme reduces the total power consumption of the receiver. The reception of a UWB packet begins with an energy efficient non-coherent synchronization portion in on-off keying (OOK) modulation non-coherent acquisition. This reduces the search space for the coherent reception by first finding the best integration window that has the most energy of the received signal. Afterwards, the receiver searches coherently in binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) modulation within only the pre-selected integration window instead of the whole symbol time. Self-mixing and template-based correlation are utilized for the non-coherent and coherent reception, respectively. Most of the front-end blocks are shared between the coherent and non-coherent modes, including the LNA, mixer, and the baseband circuitry that follows to minimize the total power consumption of the receiver. A differential architecture including a low noise amplifier (LNA), a mixer, a fast start-up template generator, an integrator, and a differential comparator are utilized for the receiver front-end. A prototype of the proposed receiver operating from 3.5 to 5 GHz over four bands, each spaced by 500 MHz, is implemented in 65-nm CMOS technology. The proposed receiver architecture achieves a −68 dBm, −70.5 dBm, and −70.8 dBm sensitivity at a 10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">−3</sup> BER at 50 MHz pulse repetition frequency (PRF) in the non-coherent, coherent, and proposed hybrid synchronization modes, respectively. The receiver consumes 6.8 mW and 8.8 mW in the non-coherent and coherent mode, respectively, when continuously ON. Using its novel synchronization mechanism, the receiver can reduce the ON time of the receiver by 68% and 34% in order to coherently synchronize and receive a 100-bit and 1024-bit payload, respectively. As a result, the energy per useful bit (EPUB) of the receiver is reduced by a factor of 2.9 from 1.24 nJ/b to 422 pJ/b for 100-bit payloads, and by a factor of 1.5 from 309 pJ/b to 204 pJ/b for 1024-bit payloads, increasing energy efficiency while maintaining the sensitivity benefits of coherent detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207