MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379804176 · doi:10.1353/nai.2021.a784816

Presidential Comments to Introduce the 2020 NAISA Business Meeting

2021· article· en· W4379804176 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shannon Speed

Bibliographic record

VenueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingPresidential systemIndigenousPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Presidential addressPolitical scienceMedia studiesHistoryPublic relationsManagementSociologyLawPublic administrationMedicineEconomicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presidential Comments to Introduce the 2020 NAISA Business Meeting Shannon Speed (bio) editors' note: NAISA, the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association, is the professional association responsible for publishing this journal. The 2020 annual meeting of the association was scheduled to be hosted by the University of Toronto in early May; however, in mid-March, facing the spreading COVID-19 pandemic, the NAISA Council made the difficult decision to cancel the in-person meeting in Toronto. The annual business meeting of the association was held via webinar on June 18, 2020. Given the extraordinary circumstances of the pandemic and its ongoing consequences, the editors invited President Speed to share her remarks from the business meeting in this issue of NAIS. Chinchokma'ni sabanna. In recent days, it has become a standard opening to begin all messages with, "I hope you and your family are well in these [fill in the blank] times." What goes in the blank varies in response to ongoing events and with our moods, which for most of us are fluctuating through a range of emotions. Indeed, the times are in many ways unprecedented, troubling, stressful, and infuriating but then randomly hopeful and sometimes downright surreal. In an astoundingly short period of time, the coronavirus laid waste to our plans and our activities, cut us off from friends and relatives, and, for so many, took away their jobs and their educations. Of course, it did not do so equally. Indeed, the COVID-19 pandemic has quickly laid bare the dramatic inequality our communities have long been experiencing both through the disproportionate impact of the virus itself and through the disproportionate economic impacts. Then, as we grappled with this new reality, the racially motivated killing of African Americans—Amhaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, Rayshard Brooks, among others—has equally exposed—yet again—the ongoing presence of a lethal racism in the United States, a lethal racism that finds echo in settler societies everywhere. It is painful, it is outrage producing, it has brought us to the brink of chaos. But the chaos is perhaps needed in the sense that in many ways these events are not, in fact, "unprecedented." They have ample precedent in the inequality produced underlying conditions that marked our communities for death in this pandemic and in the nightmarish endless replay loop of Black deaths, particularly, though [End Page 17] not exclusively, at the hands of police. As the cumulative pain became too much, we poured into the streets in record numbers, day after day after day, to say, "Ya basta, enough is enough." It is time for change. That change is bigger than reforming or abolishing policing, although we need that. Racial justice will necessarily entail the dismantling of the white supremacy that has underpinned Native dispossession and Black enslavement since European colonialism began. Gender justice will entail dismantling its corollary logic of patriarchy. In other words, the structuring logics of settler capitalism—indeed, settler capitalism itself—are long overdue for a reckoning. Another message brought by this pandemic was environmental. For a brief time, with industry halted, planes grounded, people at home, and petroleum prices through the floor, we watched in awe as the environment and our more than human relatives made a comeback. In many places, smog cleared from the sky, rivers began to lose their cloudy hue, and animals retook their territories long invaded by human activity. Change will need to include living in the world in a different way. Of course, Indigenous people have been down this road. We have faced apocalyptic devastation of our worlds and genocide of our peoples. And iilhakóffi—we survived. Indigenous peoples have a critical contribution to make in the conversation about how to create a more just, less colonized, less exploitative world as peoples who have struggled for five hundred plus years to maintain lifeways that are distinct. Without falling into overgeneralization or essentializing, I can say that these lifeways are mostly more collective, less hierarchical, and more sustainable. They are inherently anti-colonial. While Indigenous peoples have devastatingly borne the brunt of these crises, being disproportionately affected by everything from wildfires to unemployment to COVID, we also are uniquely positioned to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0210.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1210.116

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNative American and Indigenous StudiesSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207